Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pavji Soma Khandvi Dead Through Lr ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Thru The ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 2414 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2414 Bom
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2021

Bombay High Court
Pavji Soma Khandvi Dead Through Lr ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Thru The ... on 5 February, 2021
Bench: S.C. Gupte, Surendra Pandharinath Tavade
                                          36.WPST.1570.2021 aw.WPST.1572.2021.doc


               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                    WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO.1570 OF 2021

Pavji Soma Khandvi & Ors.                                 ....Petitioners
      vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                           ...Respondents

                                ALONGWITH
                    WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO.1572 OF 2021

Bhiva Shivram Bamhane & Ors.                              ....Petitioners
      vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                           ...Respondents

Mr. Balaji S. Shinde for the Petitioners in both writ petitions.
Ms. S.S. Bhende, AGP for Respondent-State in WPST/1570/2021.
Mr. N.C. Walimbe, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 in WPST/1572/2021.
Mr. A.R. Kapadnis for Respondent Nos.4 and 5.

                                CORAM        : S. C. GUPTE AND
                                               SURENDRA P. TAVADE, JJ.
                                DATE         : 5 FEBRUARY 2021.


P.C.

1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners, learned counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 and 5 and learned AGP for the Respondent-State. Rule. Rule taken up for hearing forthwith by consent of counsel.

2. The Petitioners are retired teachers who were working with schools conducted by Zilla Parishad, Nashik. They were working as Assistant Untrained Teachers. They were originally appointed on the condition that they would complete D.Ed. course. They, however, could not complete the course or acquire that qualifcation. They, however,

Aarti Palkar 1/3

36.WPST.1570.2021 aw.WPST.1572.2021.doc

duly served under Respondent Nos.4 and 5 Zilla Parishads and superannuated from the service as of the dates given in a chart in paragraph 2 of the petition. The total service rendered by the Petitioners is for anywhere between 25 and 38 years. The Petitioners' grievance is that their case is no diferent from the case of untrained teachers appointed under Zilla Parishads prior to June 1972, who were entitled to pensionary benefts under the GR of 04.10.1983. In the case of Umabhai R. Deshmukh vs. State of Maharashtra (Writ Petition No.6143 of 2016), Aurangabad bench of this Court, after considering the judgment of the Supreme Court in D.S. Nakara & Ors. vs. Union of India, reported in 1983(1) SCC, 305, bearing on the issue, held that the cut-of date for making pensionary benefts applicable to untrained teachers, namely, 01.07.1972, cannot be said to have any nexus with the object sought to be achieved under the provisions made in the GR. The Court observed that the Petitioners before it having been appointed after following due selection process and treated as regular employees working and ofciating on substantive vacant posts till their respective superannuations, some of them having even been promoted as Head Masters, retiral benefts could not be denied to them on the ground that they did not posses necessary qualifcations. The Respondents were directed to consider the case of each of the Petitioners for pensionary benefts and restrained from refusing such benefts on the ground that the concerned untrained teachers did not possess the requisite qualifcation.

3. Learned counsel for Respondent Nos.4 and 5, who alone have to showcause, does not dispute that the case of the present Petitioners is covered by the aforesaid decision of Aurangabad bench. The Petitioners in the present case, though appointed after the cut-of date, i.e. 30 June 1972, were all appointed after following due process of selection; they

Aarti Palkar 2/3

36.WPST.1570.2021 aw.WPST.1572.2021.doc

were all treated as regular employees working and ofciating in their respective posts till the dates of their superannuation.

4. Rule is accordingly made absolute and the petition is allowed by directing the Respondents to consider the case of each of the Petitioners for pensionary benefts. Such benefts shall not be denied to any of the Petitioners on the ground that they did not possess the necessary qualifcation of a trained teacher. Their cases shall be considered as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of eight weeks from today.

5. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

(SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J)                                           (S.C. GUPTE, J.)




                                          Digitally
                                 Aarti    signed by
                                          Aarti G. Palkar
                                 G.       Date:
                                          2021.02.09
                                 Palkar   14:20:54
                                          +0530




Aarti Palkar                                                                            3/3
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter