Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17895 Bom
Judgement Date : 22 December, 2021
Dusane 1/2 6 caf 48.16 in FAST 6005 .doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.48 OF 2016
IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.6005 OF 2015
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. .... Applicant
Vs.
Smt. Poonam Rajendrakumar Singh.... Respondents
& Ors.
Mr. Devendranath S. Joshi for Applicant.
None for Respondents.
Coram : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
Date : 22ND DECEMBER, 2021 P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Joshi, learned Advocate appearing for the
Applicant.
2. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are duly served. The office note
shows that the Civil Application has abated as against Respondent No. 3
and stands dismissed as against Respondent No.4. As far as the
abatement as against Respondent No. 3 is concerned, Mr. Joshi states
Dusane 2/2 6 caf 48.16 in FAST 6005 .doc
that Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are legal heirs and legal representatives of
Respondent No. 3. As far as Respondent No. 4 is concerned, he is the
owner of the vehicle and there is no statutory defence against
Respondent No. 4.
3. The Civil Application is filed for condonation of delay in
filing of appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 7 th May, 2014
passed by Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai in M.A.C.P.
No. 45 of 2007. The delay is of 190 days. The delay is adequately
explained in paragraph no. 4 of the application. Respondent Nos. 1 and
2 although served have not filed any reply to the Civil Application and
none appears for them. Therefore, the Civil Application is allowed in
terms of prayer clause (a).
( MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!