Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hp India Sales Pvt. Ltd.(Earlier ... vs Vijay Kumar Singhal Proprietor Of ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 17768 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17768 Bom
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2021

Bombay High Court
Hp India Sales Pvt. Ltd.(Earlier ... vs Vijay Kumar Singhal Proprietor Of ... on 21 December, 2021
Bench: Bharati Dangre
                                                                     16-CRA289-2021.DOC




                        AGK

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                              CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 289 OF 2021


                        HP India Sales Pvt. Ltd (earlier known as            ...Applicants
                        Hewlett-Packard India Sales Pvt. Ltd.)
                                 Versus
                        Vijay Kumar Singhal, Proprietor of Computer      ...Respondent
                        Stationery


                        Mr. Dhiraj Mhetre, with Mr. Satyasrikant Vutha, & Ms.
                        Tanushri Kejriwal, i/b M/s. Khaitan Legal Associates, for the
                        Applicants.
                        Mr. S.L. Shah, i/b Shah Legal, for the Respondent.


                                              CORAM:      Smt. Bharati Dangre, J.
                                              DATED:     21st December 2021


                        P.C.:-



1. The Applicant is aggrieved by the rejection of its application for summary judgment under Order 13A Rule 1 of Digitally the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

           signed by
           ATUL
ATUL       GANESH
GANESH     KULKARNI
KULKARNI   Date:
           2021.12.22

When I expressed my disinclination to entertain the 10:12:31 +0530 present Revision Application, the learned Counsel for the Applicant seek its withdrawal, but for an observation from this

16-CRA289-2021.DOC

Court that while determining the issues in the suit, the learned Judge shall not be influenced by the observations made by him in the impugned order dated 12.10.2021.

2. Needless to state that while the suit with the specific reliefs as sought in prayer clauses (a) to (d), the learned Judge is expected to settle the issues in the wake of the pleadings and the documents that will be tendered. The observations in the order dated 12.10.2021 being restricted only for the limited purpose of the application for summary judgment will not influence the learned Judge while determining the issues in the suit.

3. The Civil Revision Application is disposed of as withdrawn.

(Smt. Bharati Dangre, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter