Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahendra Prabhul Doshi vs Rohit Ramniklal Saraiya And Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 17733 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17733 Bom
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2021

Bombay High Court
Mahendra Prabhul Doshi vs Rohit Ramniklal Saraiya And Ors on 21 December, 2021
Bench: A.S. Gadkari
          ssm                                     1            2-wp8980.21.doc


                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                           CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                         WRIT PETITION NO. 8980 OF 2021

Mahendra Prabhul Doshi                                 .....Petitioner

          Vs.

Rohit Ramniklal Saraiya & Ors.                         .....Respondents.

Mr. Pankaj Purway for the Petitioner.
Mr. Vishal V. Kanade a/w Mr. Ramchandran Narayanan & Mr. Aditya Gupta
i/by Narayanan & Narayanan for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

                                     CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J.

DATE : 21st DECEMBER, 2021.

P.C.:-

By the present Petition, the Petitioner licensee has impugning

Order dated 28th October, 2021 passed in Revision Application No.223 of

2021 thereby rejecting his Application to grant stay to the Judgment and

Order dated 26th March, 2021, passed by the Competent Authority Rent

Control Act, Konkan Division at Mumbai in Eviction Application No.134 of

2017. Clause Nos.(iii) and (iv) of the operative part of the said Order dated

26th March, 2021 reads as under-

"(iii) The respondent is further directed to make a payment of arrears of license fee a sum of Rs.3,85,000/- within 30 days to the applicants.

(iv) The respondent is further directed to make a payment of license fee at the double rate i.e. 35,000 x 2 = 70,000/-

ssm 2 2-wp8980.21.doc

per month from 01.02.2018 to till handover the possession of application premises to the applicants."

2 The present Petition was heard on 15 th December, 2021 at

length. In view of deliberation which took place on that day, a subsequent

Order dated 16th December, 2021 was passed by this Court.

On 16th December, 2021, the learned counsel for the Petitioner

had produced a chart giving details of 50% of amount as per Clause No.(iv)

above and the entire amount of Clause No.(iii) of the said Order dated 26 th

March, 2021.

3 Accordingly today, Mr. Purway learned Advocate for the

Petitioner has brought a Demand Draft of Rs.20,12,500/- drawn on Indian

Bank, Dadar Branch bearing No.492612 in favour of the Competent

Authority Rent Control Act, Konkan Division at Mumbai. A photocopy of

the said Demand Draft is taken on record. Petitioner is directed to deposit

the said Demand Draft with the Competent Authority on or before 28 th

December, 2021.

4 As the Petitioner has shown his bonafide in depositing entire

amount of Clause No.(iii) and 50% of the amount as per Clause No.(iv) of

the operative part of the Order dated 26 th March, 2021, it will be

appropriate in the interest of justice, to set aside the Order dated 28 th

October, 2021 passed by the Revisional Authority and grant a stay to the

impugned Judgment and Order dated 26th March, 2021 passed by the

ssm 3 2-wp8980.21.doc

Competent Authority, which is accordingly done.

5 In view of the above, the impugned Order dated 28 th October,

2021 is set aside.

During the pendency of the said Revision Application No.223 of

2021, the implementation and operation of the Order dated 26 th March,

2021 passed by the Competent Authority Rent Control Act, Konkan Division

at Mumbai is stayed.

6 The Revisional Authority is requested to expedite the hearing of

the said Revision and to make an endeavour to conclude the same within a

period of six months from the date of receipt of this Order.

7 During the pendency of the Revision Application No.223 of

2021, Petitioner is further directed to continue to deposit Rs.70,000/- per

month as compensation towards suit premises in the Registry of the

Competent Authority Rent Control Act, Konkan Division at Mumbai on or

before 10th day of every month.

8 Respondent Nos.1 and 2 i.e. the landlords are at liberty to file

an Application for withdrawal of the said amount before the Revisional

Authority. The Revisional Authority will consider the said Application on its

own merits.

9 Mr. Kanade, learned counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2

submitted that, there is an outstanding of approximately Rs.97,000/-

towards electricity charges of the suit premises.       Mr. Purway, learned


                      ssm                                            4             2-wp8980.21.doc


Advocate for the Petitioner submitted that, till date the Petitioner has paid

Rs.30,000/- to the electricity provider Company and whatever is the

balance amount, will be cleared by the Petitioner on or before 31 st

December, 2021. The said statement is accepted.

10 It is made clear that, during the pendency of Revision

Application if the Petitioner makes two consecutive defaults in making

payment towards future compensation @ Rs.70,000/- per month, in that

event it will be open for the Revisional Authority to dismiss the said

Revision Application on that count alone.

11 Writ Petition is disposed off in the aforesaid terms.



                                                                           (A.S. GADKARI, J.)


             Digitally signed by
SANJIV       SANJIV
             SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA    MASHALKAR
MASHALKAR    Date: 2021.12.23
             17:15:34 +0530





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter