Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17404 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 December, 2021
Digitally
signed by
SHAMBHAVI
SHAMBHAVI NILESH
NILESH SHIVGAN 14-APEAL-411-2021.odt
SHIVGAN Date:
2021.12.14
18:53:21
+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.411 OF 2021
Kayyum Dawood Khan ...Appellant
Vs
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents
...
Mr. B.B.Tiwari i/by Mr. Azimuddin N. Kazi for the Appellant.
Smt.S.V.Sonawane, APP for the Respondent-State.
Ms. Komal G. Sinha, appointed advocate for R.No.2.
CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.
DATE : DECEMBER 14, 2021.
P.C. :
It is an appeal under Section 14A(1) of the
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)
Act, 1989 ('Act of 1989' for short).
2 Heard learned counsel for the appellant, the learned
prosecutor for the State and Ms. Komal Sinha, advocate
(appointed) on behalf of the complainant.
Shivgan 1/3
14-APEAL-411-2021.odt
3 The learned counsel appearing for the complainant
would rely on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of
Manju Devi v. Onkarjit Singh Ahluwalia alias Omkarjeet Singh
and Ors. (2017) 13 SCC 439 to contend that in view of Section
18 and 18A of the Act of 1989, any person against whom
accusation of having committed an offence has been made,
provisions of Section 438 of the Code shall not apply. Thus, she
would question maintainability of appeal for pre-arrest bail.
4 Primary evaluation of the First Information Report shows
that, if the offence under the Act of 1989 is not made out, bar under
section 18 and 18A(2) shall not apply. I have perused the First
Information Report. Admittedly, there is a dispute about
redevelopment of the building between the complainant and the
appellant. Since the matter regarding redevelopment of the property
was subject matter of civil dispute, any dispute arising on account of
that, would not disclose offence under the Act of 1989, unless the
victim is abused, intimidated, only for the reason that he belongs to
Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe.
Shivgan 2/3
14-APEAL-411-2021.odt
5 In consideration of the facts of the case, in my view, no
offence under the Act of 1989 has been disclosed in the First
Information Report. In that view of the matter, appeal is allowed.
Hence, the following order;
ORDER
(I) In the event of arrest of the appellant in Crime No. 62 of
2021 registered with Mumbra Police Station, he shall be released on
executing PR bond for the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more
sureties in like sum.
(ii) Appellant shall join the investigation as and when
required and shall co-operate in the investigation.
6 The appeal is accordingly allowed and disposed of.
7 It is made clear that observations made hereinabobve be
construed as expression of opinion only for the purpose of bail and
the same shall not in any way influence the trial in other
proceedings.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)
Shivgan 3/3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!