Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shubham S/O Krushnaji Mohadure vs State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Kamptee ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 16907 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16907 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2021

Bombay High Court
Shubham S/O Krushnaji Mohadure vs State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Kamptee ... on 6 December, 2021
Bench: V. G. Joshi
Order                                                                                                    0612appa640.21
                                                                  1


                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.


                          CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APPA] NO. 640/2021
                              IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 472/2021.
   Kunal Anilrao Powale -Versus- State of Maharashtra, through P.O. Kamptee, District Nagpur.
                          CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APPA] NO. 670/2021
                              IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 497/2021.
   Shubham Krushnaji Mohadure -Versus- State of Maharashtra, through P.O. Kamptee, Nagpur.
                .CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APPA] NO. 666/2021
                                   IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 494/2021.
         Sumit Laxman Bagde -Versus- State of Maharashtra, through P.O. Kamptee, Nagpur.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,                                                       Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders

                                                        S/Shri S.P. Bhandarkar and R.M. Daga, Advocates for
                                                        Applicants.
                                                        Shri I. Damle, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant.



                                                                          CORAM : VINAY JOSHI, J.

DATE : DECEMBER 06, 2021

Heard.

2. These applications are filed by applicants /

appellants seeking suspension of execution of substantive

sentence passed in Sessions Case No.316/2021 by the Additional

Sessions Judge-6, Nagpur on 25.10.2021. Though applicants

were charged for the offence punishable under Sections 188,

120-B, 381, 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code,

Section 3 of Essential Commodities Act and Section 18[c] of the

Drugs and Cosmetics Act. However, the trial Court has acquitted Order 0612appa640.21

them from all offences, except for Section 420 read with Section

34 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial Court has imposed

sentence to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 5 years, along with

fine of Rs.5000/- with default clause. The non-applicant State

has resisted these applications by filing separate reply affidavits.

The prosecution case in brief and evidence has been narrated.

3. The learned Counsel for applicants primely

submitted that during the course of trial though several

witnesses have been examined, however, offence of cheating has

not been proved.

4. With the assistance of both sides, I have gone

through the impugned judgment and evidence recorded during

trial. My attention has been invited to points of determination

framed by the trial Court while deciding the case. Particularly in

point no.1, the trial Court has expressed that the prosecution has

failed to prove that all the accused [including applicants] have

knowingly flouted the orders issued by the Collector pertaining

to Remdesivir vials.

5. All applicants are working as male nurse in different

hospitals. The trial Court has noted that there was no report

about theft from the hospitals where applicants were working,

hence, it is not established that applicants have committed theft

of Remdesivir vials.

6. Perusal of the impugned judgment reveals that since Order 0612appa640.21

some Remdesivir vials were found in possession of applicants,

the trial Court has expressed that they were for sale in black

market. It is argued that there is no material placed by the

prosecution to establish that applicants have deceitfully induced

someone and thereby committed the offence. In order to impress

the essentials of the offence of cheating the learned Counsel for

applicants have relied on the following decisions :-

(1) Jageshwar Singh Rastogi .vrs. State of Madhya Pradesh - 1990 Supp SCC 179.

(2) Archana Rana .vrs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another - (2021) 3 SCC 751.

(3) Mohammad Ibrahim and others .vrs. State of Bihar and another - (2009) 8 SCC 751.

(4) Samir Sahay @ Sameer Sahay .vrs. State of Urttar Pradesh and another - (2018) 14 SCC 233.

(5) Uma Shankar Gopalika .vrs. State of Bihar and another - (2005) 10 SCC 336.

Undoubtedly these principle needs consideration.

7. It is brought to my notice that there is no evidence

of witness to say that they have been cheated by these

applicants. According to learned Counsel for applicants, the

findings recorded by the trial Court are self contradictory.

8. These applicants were arrested in a case of serious

nature, however, that cannot be the sole criteria for deciding

these applications. Having regard to the fact that the trial Court Order 0612appa640.21

has acquitted applicants from the offence under the Drugs and

Cosmetics Act and Essential Commodities Act, the matter

requires consideration on merits. Submission that offence of

cheating is not established needs re-assessment. Rather

applicants have made out an arguable case on merits.

9. The trial Court has imposed a fixed term of sentence

i.e. of 5 years of imprisonment along with fine. Normally where

the fixed term of sentence is imposed, in absence of any special

feature, the execution of sentence needs to be suspended. The

appeals will take its own time for disposal. Applicants are

already in jail from last 6 months. In case the

applicants/appellants succeed in the appeal, an irreversible

position about their pre-trial detention would occur. Having

regard to these facts following order is passed.

(i) Criminal Applications are allowed and disposed of.

(ii) The execution of substantive sentence imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge-6, Nagpur vide judgment passed in Sessions Trial No.316/2021 on 25.10.2021, shall stand suspended in respect of applicants - Kunal Anilrao Powale (Criminal Application [APPA] No. 640/2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 472/2021); Shubham Krushnaji Mohadure (Criminal Application [APPA] No.670/2021 in Criminal Appeal No.497/2021) and Sumit Laxman Bagde (Criminal Application [APPA] No. 666/2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 494/2021), till the final disposal of their appeals.

         (iii)      In the meantime, aforesaid applicants be released
 Order                                                   0612appa640.21


on bail on their executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each, with one surety in the like amount.

(iv) Deposit of fine amount shall be the condition precedent for execution of this order. The trial Court shall ensure deposit of fine amount before issuing release orders.

JUDGE

Rgd.

RAKESH GANESHLAL DHURIYA

07.12.2021 17:46

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter