Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11788 Bom
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2021
fa991.12.odt 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
FIRST APPEAL NO.991/2012
Executive Engineer,
Bembla Project Division,
Yavatmal ..APPELLANT
Versus
1. Suresh s/o Ruprao Hajare,
aged 58 years, Occupation - Agriculturist,
R/o Mudliar Layout, back side of
Sunita Building, Yavatmal.
Tah and Dist. Yavatmal.
2. State of Maharashtra,
through Collector, Yavatmal.
3. Special Land Acquisition Officer
Minor Irrigation Works No.II,
Yavatmal. ..RESPONDENTS
....
Shri M.A.Kadu, Advocate for the appellant. Shri S.S.Bhalerao, Advocate for respondent no.1. Ms. M.H.Deshmukh, AGP for respondent nos.2 and 3.
.....
CORAM : PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, J DATED : AUGUST 25, 2021.
ORAL JUDGMENT :
1. Heard.
2. The appellant - Executive Engineer, Bembla Project
Division, Yavatmal, assailed the judgment and award dated
1.2.2011 in L.A.C. No.494 of 2006 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior
Division, Yavatmal, whereby the learned Reference Court enhanced
the compensation @ Rs.1,38,000 per hector for 5 H 43 Are Land of
Gat No.846 of village Pahur.
3. The learned counsel Shri S.S. Bhalrao appearing for the
respondent no.1 - Claimant pointed out the judgment of this Court
passed in First Appeal No.799/2014 (Vasant S/o Nanaji Patre Vs.
The Executive Engineer, Bembla Project Division, Yavatmal) decided
on 18.4.2015, wherein for the land which was similarly situated i.e.
acquired under the same award from Village Pahur, Tahsil
Babhulgaon, District Yavatmal, this Court enhanced compensation
at the rate of Rs. 1,60,000/- per hector with all statutory benefits.
4. Considering the findings recorded by this Court in the
aforesaid judgment in First Appeal No.799/2014 (supra), there is no
reason for this Court to consider the appeal in favour of the
appellant - The Executive Engineer, Bembla Project Division,
Yavatmal, as the amount of compensation enhanced in the present
appeal by the Reference Court is only Rs.1,38,000/- per hectare. So
far as the valuation for the four teak trees @ Rs.2,000/- enhanced
compensation by the Reference Court, I do not find any ground to
interfere with the enhanced amount of compensation, considering
the amount enhanced by the learned Reference Court.
5. Under such circumstances, I do not find any merit in
the appeal and the same needs to be dismissed. It is dismissed
accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.
JUDGE
******
Ambulkar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!