Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Executive Engineer, Minor ... vs Mohd. Sufi Abdul Rajjak And Others
2021 Latest Caselaw 11282 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11282 Bom
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2021

Bombay High Court
Executive Engineer, Minor ... vs Mohd. Sufi Abdul Rajjak And Others on 18 August, 2021
Bench: A.S. Chandurkar, Govinda Ananda Sanap
                                            1                                      FA106-18.odt


                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                             NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
                 C.A.F. NO.1563/2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.106/2018
 (EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, PUSAD, DISTT. YAVATMAL VERSUS
                      MOHD. SUFI ABDUL RAJJAK & OTHERS)

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions                     Court's or Judge's order
and Registrar's orders.
        Shri N.M. Gaidhane, counsel for the applicant.
        Shri V.N. Patre, counsel for the R-1 to 4.
        Ms S.S. Jachak, A.G.P. for the R-5 to 7.

         CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND G.A. SANAP, JJ.

DATED : 18TH AUGUST, 2021.

By this application, the claimant seeks modification of the order dated 21.09.2018 and seeks to withdraw the balance amount remain in deposit by furnishing undertaking.

While granting stay to the execution of the award, the appellant was directed to deposit 60% of that amount. On 21.09.2018 the claimant was permitted to withdraw 50% of that amount on furnishing solvent surety and balance 50% on filing an undertaking. 50% of that amount has been withdrawn by filing undertaking. According to the claimant, he is not in a position to furnish solvency of an amount of Rs.2,21,65,000/- for withdrawing further 50% of the amount. Hence, by this application the claimant seeks modification of that order.

Perused the judgment of the reference Court. Considering the fact that the appellant has deposited 60% of the decretal amount and the claimant has withdrawn half of that amount by furnishing undertaking, the claimant is permitted to withdraw further 20% of the amount lying in deposit subject to filing an undertaking that in case the appeal is allowed, the amount withdrawn shall be repaid with interest at such rate the Court may direct. The balance amount shall remain invested in fixed deposit.

The civil application is disposed of.

                (G.A. SANAP, J.)                          (A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.)
APTE




 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter