Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11119 Bom
Judgement Date : 17 August, 2021
*1* 12wp13718o18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.13718 OF 2018
BABURAO ANANDA RAHATE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Kedar Shrimant R.
AGP for Respondents 1 and 2 : Shri S.B. Pulkundwar
Advocate for Respondents 4 and 5 : Shri V.G. Salgare
Advocate for Respondent 3 : Shri A.N.Jagatkar
...
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
&
S.G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATE :- 17th August, 2021 Per Court :-
1. We have heard the learned advocates for the
respective sides to some extent. By an order passed by this Court
on 03.12.2015 in Writ Petition No.781/2015, the Deputy Director
of Education was directed to hear the petitioner as well as
respondent Nos.3 to 5 to the extent of the prayer of the petitioner
for payment of his salary dues with effect from 01.09.2008 till he
was in employment upto 03.12.2015. The Deputy Director of
Education was indicated by this Court that he would hear all the
parties on the representation made by the petitioner and pass a
reasoned order.
2. There is no dispute that on the representation made
*2* 12wp13718o18
by the petitioner pursuant to the order of this Court, the
Education Officer (Primary), has passed an order on 01.11.2019
mandating the payment of salary to the petitioner on the basis of
the pay scale Rs.5200-20200/- with Grade Pay of Rs.2800. There
is also no dispute that, neither the petitioner nor respondent No.4/
Management, have challenged this order before this Court.
3. The petitioner has preferred this petition seeking
calculations of his unpaid salary by acknowledging that he has
received Rs.1,51,200/- until now. By this petition, the petitioner
has put forth prayer clause B, which reads as under :-
"B) Kindly be directed to Respondent No.4 and 5 to release the due salary of petitioner from 01.09.2008 to 15.12.2014 with 9% interest thereon."
4. Despite the fact situation that respondent No.4/
Management has not challenged the order of the Education
Officer dated 01.11.2019, which was delivered pursuant to our
directions, Shri Salgare, learned advocate, consistently argues
before us that there are many judgments which are to be
considered and there is Schedule-C which is to be considered. All
his submissions are abstruse and in the absence of posing a
substantive challenge to the said order. We cannot entertain such
*3* 12wp13718o18
arguments which are made in air without there being any
challenge to a specific order passed by the competent authority
pursuant to the directions of this Court.
5. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is partly
allowed with the following directions :-
(a) Respondent No.3/ Education Officer shall calculate
the unpaid salary of the petitioner in view of the pay
scale set out on internal page 4 of the order dated
01.11.2019. Such calculations shall be made on or
before 15.09.2021, taking into account that an
amount of Rs.1,51,200/- has been paid by the
Management to the petitioner.
(b) Respondent No.3 shall transmit the said order
calculating the unpaid salary, to respondent No.4/
Management on or before 30.09.2021 directing
respondent No.4 to make the said payment to the
petitioner within 30 days therefrom i.e. the
Management shall be duty bound to pay the said
amount to the petitioner on or before 30.10.2021.
kps (S.G. MEHARE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!