Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sanjay Piter Shelke vs The State Of Mah And Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 10507 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10507 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 August, 2021

Bombay High Court
Sanjay Piter Shelke vs The State Of Mah And Ors on 6 August, 2021
Bench: Ravindra V. Ghuge, S. G. Mehare
                                           -1-

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                           BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                        CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5788 OF 2021
                      IN WP/3072/2012 WITH WP/3072/2012

                              SANJAY PITER SHELKE
                                    VERSUS
                     THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Ms.S.A.Kale h/f Mr. A.B.Kale, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr.H.S.Adwant h/f Mr.S.V.Adwant, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

Mr.S.G.Sangle, AGP for State.

Mr.Bhargav Kulkarni h/f. Mr.Sharad Natu, Advocate for respondent No.5.

( CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & S.G. MEHARE, JJ)

DATE : AUGUST 6, 2021

PER COURT :

1. Considering the order that we are passing on the gracious consent of

the learned Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3/Management and the

learned Advocate representing the applicant, we are recording certain

factors emerging from this case as under :-

[a] The applicant has acquired the decree of Bachelor of Arts with

Economics as a specialization and Geography and Psychology as general

subjects.

[b] He has also acquired the qualification of B.P.Ed.

[c] He joined as a "Shikshan Sevak" on 01/02/2003 with St.Xaviers High

School at Ranjankhol, Tal.Rahata, Dist.Ahmednagar. He subsequently was

khs/Aug. 2021/5788

confirmed as an "Assistant Teacher" after completing 3 years.

[d] He worked as an "Assistant Teacher" till 14/07/2012 when the said

school was permanently closed down under the orders of the Education

Department.

[e] There was one litigation with regard to the transfer of the applicant

and after approaching the competent forum, he succeeded in receiving a

judgment setting aside his transfer.

[f] An advertisement was published by respondent No.2/Education

Society for appointing Shikshan Sevaks to teach the subjects of English and

Geography/physical Education.

[g]    The petitioner applied for such post.

[h]    He was interviewed by the Management and was appointed as a

"Shikshan Sevak" w.e.f. July 2021.



2. The petitioner has approached this Court vide this application

putting forth a request that considering his earlier tenure of service with

another school of the same Management, he should not be treated as a

Shikshan Sevak and that he should be granted regularization as an Assistant

Teacher w.e.f. July 2021.

3. In the above backdrop, considering the peculiar facts of this case,

we called upon the learned Advocate for the Management to consider

whether the probation period of the applicant as a Shikshan Sevak could be

khs/Aug. 2021/5788

reduced from 3 years to 2 years. The Management has agreed to do so and

has consented for the same. The applicant has also expressed his consent

to be on probation for 2 years.

4. This application is therefore disposed off with the following

observations :-

[a] Considering the peculiar facts of this case and the consent of the parties, the applicant would be working as a "Shikshan Sevak" from July 2021 till 30/06/2023. Thereafter, unless there is any legal impediment, he would be appointed as an "Assistant Teacher". [b] We have passed this order keeping in view the peculiar facts and that the applicant has only 4 years left for his superannuation. [c] Respondent No.4/Education Officer (Secondary) shall consider this case as a special case and shall accordingly pass orders for approval of the appointment of the applicant.

[d] It is expected that the applicant would peacefully perform his duties and there would be no occasion for the Management to initiate any action against him.

5. We make it clear that, by this order, we are not laying down any

precedent and this order shall not be cited by any party, as a precedent.

We are keeping all the contentions of the litigating parties open in WP

No.3072/2012.

           ( S.G. MEHARE, J. )               ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )


khs/Aug. 2021/5788





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter