Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pushpa Ashok Thakur Alias Pushpa ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 10351 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10351 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2021

Bombay High Court
Pushpa Ashok Thakur Alias Pushpa ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 4 August, 2021
Bench: S.V. Gangapurwala, R. N. Laddha
                                     1                               wp 8333.21

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                      WRIT PETITION NO. 8333 OF 2021

          Pushpa Ashok Thakur @
          Pushpa Daulat Thakur                           ..   Petitioner

                   Versus

          The State of Maharashtra and others            ..   Respondents

 Shri Sagar S. Phatale, Advocate h/f Shri Sushant C. Yeramwar,
 Advocate for the Petitioner.
 Shri S. K. Tambe, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

                           CORAM :    S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND
                                      R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATE : 04TH AUGUST, 2021.

FINAL ORDER :

. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents/State confirms that the validation proceeding is pending with the committee and the matter is sent for re- vigilance.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the employer has issued notice to the petitioner to submit the validity within three days or else adverse action would be taken.

3. It is not in the hands of the litigant to get the validation proceeding decided within the stipulated period.

4. In the light of the above, we pass the following order.

2 wp 8333.21

5. The impugned notice is quashed and set aside. The petitioner shall appear before the Scrutiny Committee on 07 th September, 2021 and co-operate in expeditious disposal of the said proceeding. The Committee shall endeavour to decide the proceeding within a period of six (06) months from the date of appearance of the petitioner. The employer may not take adverse action against the petitioner only on the ground that validation proceeding is pending. Of course, the employer may take further course of action depending upon the judgment that would be delivered by the Committee in the validation proceeding.

6. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

[R. N. LADDHA, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]

bsb/Aug. 21

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter