Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 7987 Bom
Judgement Date : 10 October, 2017
1 912) wp890-12.doc
SAS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.890 OF 2017
National Centre for the Performing Arts
(NCPA) & Anr. ..Petitioners.
V/s.
The Joint Charity Commissioner & Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr.D.J.Khambata, Senior Advocate with Ms.Naira Jeejabhoy with
Mr.H.D.Nanavati, Mr.H.N.Vakil & Ms.S.M.Vakil i/b. Mulla & Mulla
and Cragie Blunt & Caroe for the Petitioners.
Mrs.Uma Palsuledesai, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2-State.
CORAM: M.S. SONAK, J.
DATE : OCTOBER 10, 2017
ORAL JUDGMENT
Rule. At the request of learned counsel for the parties,
rule is made returnable forthwith.
2. Heard Mrs.Naira Jejeebhoy for the Petitioner and Ms.Uma
Palsuledesai, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 - State.
::: Uploaded on - 13/10/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 14/10/2017 02:07:34 :::
2 912) wp890-12.doc
3. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated December 27,
2016 by which the Petitioner's Miscellaneous Application No.532/2016
seeking modification to the order dated June 20, 2015 came to be
dismissed by the Joint Charity Commissioner.
4. The operative part of the Joint Charity Commissioner's order
dated June 20, 2015 reads as follows:-
"Thus, I answer both the points are in the affirmative and
proceed to pass the following order :-
ORDER
1) Application is allowed.
2) Permission is granted to the applicant trust to sell and
alienate trust property described in application at Exh.1 in favour of Ms.Smita G.Crishna, Ms.Freyan V.Crishna & Mrs. Nyrika V.Crishna respectively for Rs.372 crores by executing registered sale deed within the period of six months from passing of this order on the terms and conditions of draft indenture of conveyance which is annexed and marked as Exh.'L'.
3) The Governing Council is hereby directed to deposit Rs.300 crores in any nationalized bank as defined in the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 or in any co-operative bank approved by the State Government and to utilize interest earned thereon for carrying out the objects of the trust.
4) The applicant trust is hereby directed to deposit remaining Rs.72 crores in saving bank account of said trust to meet the immediate expenses and losses suffered by the trust.
3 912) wp890-12.doc
5) Permission is granted subject to the provision or
prohibition of any other Act for the time being in force. "
5. By the Miscellaneous Application No.533/2016, the
Petitioner trust had basically applied for the modification of clause (3) of
the operative portion of the order dated June 20, 2015. The modification
applied for was in order to permit the Petitioner trust to withdraw the
amount of Rs.300 crores from the nationalized bank and to re-invest the
said amount in permitted securities as specified by section 35 of the
Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 ('the Trust Act').
6. By the impugned order dated December 27, 2016, however,
the Joint Charity Commissioner has dismissed this application by holding
that there is no justification for the request made. The Joint Charity
Commissioner further observed that the mere fact that the trust could
earn more interest cannot be said to be relevant or sufficient to protect the
interest of the Petitioner trust, which is of paramount consideration in
trust matters.
7. The Joint Charity Commissioner has observed that deposit in
nationalized bank is more safe and more secure, than, investment in any
permitted securities.
4 912) wp890-12.doc
8. Ms. Jejeebhoy, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that
section 35 of the Trust Act specifically provides for investment of public
trust's money in any scheduled bank as defined in the Reserve Bank of
India Act, 1934 or any in the Postal Savings Bank or in a Co-
operative Bank approved by the State Government for the purpose
or to invest it in public securities. Since, the statute itself permits a
public trust to make such investment, it was not open to the Joint Charity
Commissioner to decline the permission based upon his opinion, that
deposits in nationalized bank are more safe and secure. Ms. Jejeebhoy also
drew the attention of this Court to a circular dated October 12, 1978
stating that trustees should not be compelled to invest the trust funds in
any one particular manner. The trust should be encouraged to invest the
surplus funds in securities floated from time to time by the public sector
undertakings of the State Government like the SICOM, CIDCO and
MSEB, etc. on their debentures being declared on public securities under
section 2(12)(d) of the Trust Act.
9. Ms.Palsuledesai, learned AGP submits that the impugned
order has been made by the Joint Charity Commissioner keeping in mind
the interest of the Petitioner trust. Learned AGP further submits that she
is not in a position to state as to whether the circular dated October 12,
5 912) wp890-12.doc
1978 upon which reliance was placed by Jeejaboi, is clearly emanating
from the office of the Charity Commissioner and whether the same is in
force, till date.
10. The Petitioner Trust in Miscellaneous Application
No.533/2015 had applied for following substantive reliefs :-
(a) Application be allowed;
(b) The Judgment and order dated 20-6-2015 passed in Application No.70/2014 under section 36-1(a) of the Maharashtra public Trust Act, 1950 in the matter of National Centre for Performing Arts be modified to the extent that the Applicant Trust is permitted to invest the amount of Rs.300 crores in the afore mentioned permitted securities as permitted u/s.35 of the Maharashtra Public Trust Public Trust Act, 1950;
(c) For such other just and proper orders in the interest of Trust and Justice ;
(d) Cost of this Application be allowed."
11. Section 35 of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 reads
as follows :-
" 35. Investment of public trust money
(1) Where the trust property consists of money and cannot be applied immediately or at any early date to the purposes of the public trust the trustee shall be bound 3[notwithstanding any
6 912) wp890-12.doc
direction contained in the instrument of the trust) to deposit the money in any Scheduled Bank as defined in the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, in the Postal Savings Bank or in a Co- operative Bank approved by the State Government for the purpose or to invest it in public securities] :
Provided that such money may be invested in the first mortgage of immovable property situate in 4[any part of India] if the property is not leasehold for a term of years and the value of the property exceeds by one-half the mortgage money :
Provided further that the Charity Commissioner may by general or special order permit the trustee of any public trust or classes of such trusts to invest the money in any other manner.
(2) Nothing in sub-section (1) shall affect any investment or deposit already made before the coming into force of the Bombay Public Trusts (Amendment) Act, 1954, in accordance with a direction contained in the instrument of the trust:
Provided that any interest or dividend received or accruing from such investment or deposit on or after the coming into force of the said Act or any sum [so invested or deposited] on the maturity of the said investment or deposit shall be applied or invested in the manner prescribed in sub-
7 912) wp890-12.doc
section (1)]. "
12. As observed by the Joint Charity Commissioner in the
impugned order, no doubt, interest of the trust is of paramount
consideration. However, that does not mean that trust have to be
restrained from making investment in terms of what is permitted by
section 35 of the Trust Act. The legislative policy in this case is reflected
in section 35 of the Trust Act which provides that where the trust
property consists of money that cannot be applied immediately or at
any early date to the purposes of the public trust, the trustees shall be
bound, notwithstanding any direction contained in the instrument of
the trust, to deposit the money in any Scheduled Bank as defined in
the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, in the Postal Savings Bank or in
a Co-operative Bank approved by the State Government for the
purpose or to invest it in public securities.
13. The expression "public securities" is defined under
section 2(12) of the Trust Act to mean as follows :-
"2(12) "public securities " means--
(a) securities of the Central Government or any State
8 912) wp890-12.doc
Governments;
(b) stocks, debentures or shares in Railway or other
companies, the interest or dividend on which has been guaranteed by the Central or any State Government;
(c) debentures or other securities for money issued by or on behalf of any local authority in exercise of the powers conferred by an Act of the Central or State Legislature;
(d) a security expressly authorised by an order which the State Government makes in this behalf . "
14. In this case, although this Court was prima facie satisfied
that the impugned order warrants interference, the Petitioner Trust
was directed to indicate the manner in which the amount of Rs.300
crores was proposed to be invested at-least in first instance.
15. In pursuance to the said direction Mr. Khushroo
Nariman Suntook, Chairman of the Petitioner trust has filed an
affidavit. Paragraphs 2 and 3 of his affidavit are relevant and the
same reads as follows :-
"(2) Accordingly, the Petitioners have decided to make the
9 912) wp890-12.doc
initial re-investments as hereunder, till such time as circumstances require such investments to be varied depending upon the prevailing rates of interest and other relevant factors or till such time as the Petitioners require these funds or part thereof, for utilization towards fulling the Objects of the Trust ;
a) Rs.200 crores (approximately) in Fixed Deposits with HDFC Ltd.
b) Rs.100 crores (approximately) in 8% GOI Savings Taxable Bonds.
3. a) Fixed deposits with HDFCA Ltd. are declared as "Public Securities' , under section 2(12) (d) of the Bombay public Trusts Act, 1950. A certificate issued by HDFC Ltd. along with Order No.BPT/1989/2743(89)-VI dated 22nd July, 1986 issued by Law and Judiciary Department, Mantralaya, stating that HDFC Trust Deposits (i.e. Deposits made under the category of 'Ttusts') are declared as 'Public Securities', are hereto annexed and marked as Exhibit-1 and Exhibit-2 respectively.
b) The GOI Savings Taxable Bonds are eligible investments as 'public securities' under section 35 of the Trust Act read with the definition of 'public securities' in section 2(12) of the Trust Act. "
10 912) wp890-12.doc
16. From the aforesaid, it is clear that the Petitioner trust
seeks to invest Rs.300 crores in HDFC Limited and 8% GOI Savings
Taxable Bonds. In the affidavit, it is stated that the fixed deposits
with HDFC Limited are declared as public securities for the purpose
of section 2(12) of the Trust Act. Necessary certificate in this regard
has also been enclosed along with the affidavit. Similarly, 8% GOI
Savings Taxable Bonds are also public securities under section 2(12)
of the Trust Act. Further, the Petitioner trust in the affidavit has
undertaken that they shall intimate the office of the Charity
Commissioner, Mumbai annually of such further re-investments or
variations thereto, till such time as monies are completely utilized for
fulfilling the objectives of the trust. In this case, since investments
are proposed to be made in terms of section 35 of the Trust Act in
'public securities' as defined under section 2(12) of the Trust Act,
there is no necessity of adverting to the issue as to whether the
circular dated October 12, 1978 is in force or not. Irrespective of
whether such circular has been issued by the Charity Commissioner
or not, the reliefs applied for by the Petitioner trust, can be
11 912) wp890-12.doc
considered to the extent indicated.
17. In these proceedings, there is no necessity to go into the
issue as to whether the Petitioner Trust is repeatedly required to seek
permission of the Joint Charity Commissioner whenever it proposes
to make investment in terms of section 35 of the Trust Act.
However, based upon the materials placed on record by the
Petitioner, the Petitioners are certainly entitled to modification of the
order dated June 2, 2016 so as to permit the Petitioner trust to make
investment in terms of section 35 of the Trust Act, in the first
instance with HDFC Limited and 8% GOI Savings Taxable Bonds.
The request on behalf of the Petitioner trust is both reasonable and
in consonance with the general scheme of section 35 of the Trust
Act. In these circumstances, while appreciating the approach of the
Joint Charity Commissioner in seeking to protect the interest of the
Petitioner trust, the impugned order warrants interference.
18. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside. Instead, the
Petitioner trust is granted leave to withdraw the amount of Rs.300
crores already invested in the nationalized bank in pursuance of the
12 912) wp890-12.doc
order dated June 20, 2015 and thereafter to invest forthwith, an
amount of Rs.200 crores (approximately) in HDFC Limited and
Rs.100 crores (approximately) in 8% GOI Savings Taxable Bonds in
the first instance. As noted earlier, both these investments answer
definition of the expression 'public securities' under section 2(12) of
the Trust Act.
19. The Miscellaneous Application No.533/2016 made by
the Petitioner trust is, therefore, liable to be allowed and is hereby
allowed to the aforesaid extent.
20. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. There
shall not no order as to costs.
All concerned to act upon an authenticated copy of this
order.
( M.S. SONAK J. )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!