Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 455 Bom
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2017
wp951.17
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Writ Petition No. 951 of 2017
1. Tirupati M. Goskula,
Assistant Professor,
Electronics & Telecommunication
Department, Anjuman College
of Engg. & Tech., Sadar,
Nagpur-1.
2. Mohammad Nasiruddin M. Bashiruddin,
Associate Professor & Head,
Electronics & Telecommunication
Department, Anjuman College
of Engg. & Tech., Sadar,
Nagpur-1.
3. Swati Shailendra Sorte,
resident of Plot No. 163,
Chandan Nagar,
Post - Hanuman Nagar,
Nagpur-09.
4. Rasika Manapure,
C/o Deepak Chafle,
Opp : Shivaji Sabhagruha,
New Subhedar Layout,
Nagpur.
::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 27/08/2017 18:41:31 :::
wp951.17
2
5. Vinay Keshwani,
resident of Plot No.6,
Mangesh Colony,
Civil Lines, Nagpur-1.
6. Sunil Kumar Nathmal Palod,
resident of 89, Sankalp Nagar,
Opp : Nandanwan Junior College,
Wathoda Layout, Nagpur.
7. Manish S. Kimmatkar,
resident of 354, Shraddha
C. P & Berar College Square,
Opp : Swami Samarth Mandir,
Tulsi Bagh Road, Mahal, Nagpur.
8. Satyajit A. Pangaonkar,
C/o Dr. Sanjay Asutkar,
near Ganesh Temple,
Rail Toli, Gondia. ..... Petitioners.
Versus
1. Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj
Nagpur University,
Nagpur, through its
Registrar, Nagpur.
2. Manoharbhai Patel Institute of
Engineering & Technology,
through its Principal,
Kudwa, Gondia-441 614. .... Respondents.
*****
Mr. Anand Parchure, Adv., for the petitioners.
Mr. R.D. Bhuibhar, Adv., for respondent no.1.
::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 27/08/2017 18:41:31 :::
wp951.17
3
mr. Sachin Khandekar, Adv., for respondent no.2.
*****
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND
A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.
Date : 03rd May, 2017
ORAL JUDGMENT [Per B.R. Gavai, J.]:
01. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by
consent.
02. Shri R.D. Bhuibhar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of
respondent no.1-University, on instructions, states that the respondent
no.1-University is willing to re-consider the issue regarding
registration of the petitioners.
03. The statement made on behalf of the respondent no.1-
University that the respondent-University shall re-consider the issue
regarding registration of the petitioners is taken on record. The same
shall be done within a period of one month from today.
wp951.17
04. In that view of the matter, Rule is made absolute in terms of
Prayer Clause [I].
Judge Judge
-0-0-0-0-
|hedau|
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!