Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 9794 Bom
Judgement Date : 19 December, 2017
1 wp570.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.570 OF 2017
Dinesh s/o. Gajanan Kawle,
Aged about 24 years, r/o. Lahan
Umri, Akola, Tq. and Distt. Akola. .......... PETITIONER
// VERSUS //
1.Superintendent of Police,
Akola, Tq. and Distt. Akola.
2.Sub-Divisional Police Officer,
Akola City, Tq. & Distt.
Akola.
3.Divisional Commissioner,
Amravati. .......... RESPONDENTS
::: Uploaded on - 20/12/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2017 02:01:52 :::
2 wp570.17.odt
____________________________________________________________
Mr.H.R.Gadhia, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mrs. M.H.Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
____________________________________________________________
CORAM : R.K.DESHPANDE
AND
M.G.GIRATKAR, JJ.
DATED : 19th December, 2017.
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per R.K.Deshpande, J) :
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent
of the learned Counsel for the respective parties.
2. A show cause notice was issued to the petitioner by
respondent no.1 on 1.8.2016 proposing to extern the petitioner from
the Municipal limits of Cities of Akola, Washim, Amravati, Yavatmal
and Buldana districts for a period of two years. In the show cause
notice, a reference was made to the prosecution pending against the
petitioner in three different Courts for various offences including the
offences punishable under Sections 302, 324, 341, 504, 147, 148 and
149 etc. of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 4 and 25 of the
3 wp570.17.odt
Arms Act. The petitioner replied to the said show cause notice
pointing out that he was acquitted from all the offences. The order
passed u/s.55 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 shows that the
cases are pending against the petitioner. In the appeal, the Divisional
Commissioner, Amravati, in his order dt.20.5.2017, recorded the
finding that the petitioner was acquitted from all the proceedings on
24.9.2015, 22.3.2016 and 30.1.2016. However, he confirms the
order passed by the District Superintendent of Police on 26.8.2016 in
exercise of his apparent jurisdiction under Section 60 of the
Maharashtra Police Act, 19, 1951.
3. In view of the undisputed factual position that the
petitioner is acquitted of the offences mentioned above, the order of
externent impugned in the petition cannot be sustained. It is based
on extraneous material. Hence, the same will have to be quashed and
set aside.
4. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is allowed. The
order dated 26.8.2016 passed by the Superintendent of Police,
Akola/respondent no.1 and the order dated 20.5.2017 passed by the
4 wp570.17.odt
Divisional Commissioner, Amravati/respondent no.3 impugned in
this petition are quashed and set aside.
Rule is made absolute in the above terms. No order as to
costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
[jaiswal]
5 wp570.17.odt
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!