Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 9743 Bom
Judgement Date : 18 December, 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 6681 OF 2017
Rupali Rajendra Majkuri,
age: 23 years, Occu. Student,
r/o Katneshwar, Tq. Purna,
Dist. Parbhani. .. PETITIONER.
VERSUS
1. The State of Maharashtra,
Tribal Development Department,
through its Secretary,
Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.
2. The Scheduled Tribe Certificate,
Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad,
through its Deputy Director / Member.
3. The Deputy Collector/
District Supply Officer,
Parbhani, Tq. & Dist. Parbhani.
4. The Sub Divisional Officer,
Degloor, Tq. Degloor,
Dist. Nanded.
5. The Dean / Principal,
Government Medical College
and Hospital (GHATI), Aurangabad.
6. The Registrar,
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences,
Nashik, Dindori Road, Nashik,
Tq. & Dist. Nashik. .. RESPONDENTS.
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Jadhavar Pratap V.
AGP for Respondent/State: Mr.R.V. Dasalkar.
...
::: Uploaded on - 22/12/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 23/12/2017 01:52:19 :::
6681.17wp
2
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA
& V.L. ACHLIYA,JJ.
Dated: DECEMBER,18, 2017.
ORAL JUDGMENT: [Per Gangapurwala, J]
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard
finally with consent of the parties.
2. The tribe certificate of Koli Mahadev scheduled tribe
issued to the petitioner by the Sub Divisional Officer,
Parbhani has been cancelled and confiscated on the
ground that the Sub Divisional Officer, Parbhani did not
have jurisdiction. Liberty is given to the petitioner to get
certificate from the competent authority.
3. Mr.Jadhavar, learned Advocate for the petitioner
states that father of the petitioner has been issued with
tribe certificate of Koli Mahadev - scheduled tribe by Sub
Divisional Officer, Degloor and the tribe certificate of
father of the petitioner has been validated by the
Scrutiny Committee on 21.04.2001.
6681.17wp
4. We heard learned AGP for the respondent - State.
5. In view of Rule 5(2)(b)(ii) of the Maharashtra
Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of Issuance and
Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003, if the father or
grandfather of the candidate has been issued with the
caste / tribe certificate by Sub Divisional Officer at one
place, then the candidate can obtain such certificate
from the competent authority at the place where he is
residing.
6. In the present case, father of the petitioner has
been issued tribe certificate by the authority at Degloor
and the said tribe certificate is also validated. The Sub
Divisional Officer, Parbhani could have issued tribe
certificate to the petitioner as she is resident of Purna,
District Parbhani.
7. In the light of the above, the impugned judgment
and order is quashed and set aside. Respondent No.2
6681.17wp
committee shall decide the validation proceedings in
respect of tribe claim of the petitioner expeditiously on its
own merits considering it to have been issued by the
competent authority, preferably within nine months.
Respondent Nos.5 and 6 shall not preclude the petitioner
from prosecuting further studies only on the ground that
validation proceeding is pending. Respondent Nos.5 and
6 can take appropriate action depending on the
validation proceedings. Rule accordingly made absolute.
No costs.
(V.L.ACHLIYA,J) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J)
kadam/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!