Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nakul Venkatrao Totawar vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 6670 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 6670 Bom
Judgement Date : 31 August, 2017

Bombay High Court
Nakul Venkatrao Totawar vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 31 August, 2017
Bench: R.M. Borde
                                     (1)                             wp10707.17

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                      WRIT PETITION NO. 10707 OF 2017

Nakul Venkatrao Totawar                               ..       Petitioner
Age.31 years, Occ. Nil,
R/o. Bhat Galli, Degloor, 
Tq. Degloor, Dist. Nanded.

                                    Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                        ..       Respondents
      Through its Secretary,
      Tribal Development Department,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.

2.    The Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad.
      Through its Deputy Director ®.

3.    The Sub-Divisional Officer,
      Degloor, Tq. Degloor,
      Dist. Nanded.

4.    The Deputy Director,
      Health Services, Latur Division,
      Latur, Tq. & Dist. Latur.

5.    The District Malaria Officer,
      Nanded, Tq. & Dist. Nanded.

Mr.Pratap V. Jadhavar, Advocate for the petitioner. 
Mr.P.S. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent/State.


                                     CORAM :  R.M. BORDE &
                                              S.M.GAVHANE,JJ.

DATED : 31.08.2017

(2) wp10707.17

ORAL JUDGMENT [PER : R.M. BORDE,J.] :-

1. Heard.

2. Rule. With the consent of the parties, petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission.

3. This petition is taking exception to the decision rendered by the Scrutiny Committee directing invalidation of Tribe Certificate issued to the petitioner as belonging to "Mannervarlu" - Scheduled Tribe on technical ground of occurrence of spelling mistake in recording name of the Tribe in the Certificate issued to the petitioner by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Degloor on 29.04.2009.

4. The issue raised in the instant matter is no more res-integra and is covered by the decision rendered in Writ Petition No.6263 of 2017 and other companion matters. For the reasons recorded in the judgment referred to above, the instant petition also deserves to be allowed and the same is accordingly allowed.

5. The order impugned in this petition stands quashed and set aside. The Scrutiny Committee is directed to return the original Tribe Certificate

(3) wp10707.17

produced by the petitioner before it, within four weeks from today. The petitioner shall tender an undertaking to the Scrutiny Committee that he would approach the concerned competent authority for ratifying the spelling mistake occurred in recording name of the Tribe and shall produce corrected certificate within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the original certificate. The petitioner shall approach the Sub- Divisional Officer, Degloor for recording corrections in the Certificate already issued to him. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Degloor shall issue corrected certificate within a period of four weeks from the date of approach of the petitioner, without embarking upon further enquiry in the matter. On receipt of corrected Certificate, same shall be produced before the appointing authority within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt and appointing authority shall forward it to Scrutiny Committee for validation. The Scrutiny Committee shall thereafter proceed to decide the claim of the petitioner for validation of the Tribe Certificate and render decision on the proposal within a period of one year from the date of receipt of corrected Certificate together with the proposal. It would be open for the petitioner to tender the corrected Certificate and the proposal directly to the Scrutiny Committee and the Scrutiny Committee shall entertain the same.

(4) wp10707.17

6. Rule is made absolute accordingly in above terms. There shall be no order as to costs.

7. In the meanwhile, appointing authority shall keep seat available for petitioner and shall issue letter of appointment on production of caste certificate and subject to undertaking to produce validation certificate.

       [S.M.GAVHANE,J.]                        [R.M.BORDE,J.]


snk/2017/AUG17/wp10707.17





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter