Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 6217 Bom
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2017
Sherla V.
caf.1902.2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1902 OF 2017
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.1612 OF 2016
Shri Balbhim Baburao Sankpal ... Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
The New India Assurance Co. ltd. ... Appellant
Vs.
Shri Balbhim Baburao Sankpal & anr. ... Respondents
Mr.B.H. Bhalwal for the Applicant
Mr.D.S. Joshi for Insurance Company
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
DATE: AUGUST 16, 2017 P.C.:
1. Upon urgent mentioning, taken on Production Board.
2. This Civil Application is moved by the original claimant i.e., the
respondent in the First Appeal for withdrawal of the amount which was
deposited by the appellant insurance company in terms of the award of the
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated 15.7.2016. The amount of the
award is Rs.1,32,87,512/- with interest.
3. Learned Counsel for the applicant i.e., the claimant, submitted that
the applicant had met with an accident in 1999 and is quadriplegic and he
needs money for medical expenses and also for residential
accommodation as he has already sold his earlier flat in 2005 on account
caf.1902.2017.doc
of his medical treatment. The learned Counsel prayed that the entire
amount of compensation is to be allowed to be withdrawn by him.
4. The learned Counsel for the insurance company while opposing this
application submitted that the insurance company has deposited the entire
decretal amount with interest accrued thereon which comes to
Rs.2,69,00,000/- approximately. The learned Counsel submitted that
earlier out of this money, a sum of Rs.10 lakhs was allowed to be
withdrawn on 31.1.2017 and a further sum of Rs.10 lakhs on 9.3.2017.
5. The learned Counsel further submitted that the claimant has filed
Cross Objections and the said Cross Objections and the First Appeal are
to be heard by the Division Bench together and the insurance company
has good defence on the point of negligence and quantum.
6. Considered the case of the applicant and also the defence taken by
the insurance company. Cross Objections are filed by the applicant,
however the claim is above the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Single Judge
of this Court. However, the learned Counsel for the applicant submitted
that he has moved this application in the First Appeal and his counter
claim is yet to be heard and admitted. He submitted that the applicant is in
dire need of money as he wants to vacate the tenanted house and buy a
new house.
caf.1902.2017.doc
7. In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the
applicant/claimant is allowed to withdraw an amount of Rs.1 crore on
furnishin usual personal undertaking before the Registrar, Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal, Mumbai. The remaining amount shall be deposited in a
fixed deposit with any nationalised Bank till the disposal of the appeal.
8. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!