Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rohidas Yashwant Gangade vs The State Of Maharashtra
2017 Latest Caselaw 5942 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 5942 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 August, 2017

Bombay High Court
Rohidas Yashwant Gangade vs The State Of Maharashtra on 14 August, 2017
Bench: V.K. Tahilramani
 jdk                                                   1                                              15.crwp.3009.17.doc



              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                   CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3009 OF 2017

C-7133 Rohidas Yashwant
Gangade                                                                         .. Petitioner

                    Vs.

The State of Maharashtra                                                        .. Respondent



                               ....
Ms.Rohini Dandekar Advocate appointed for Petitioner
Mr. Arfan Sait A.P.P. for the State
                               ....


                            CORAM :                         SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI &
                                                            DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
                           DATED :                          AUGUST 14, 2017


ORAL JUDGMENT [PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]:

1                   Heard both sides.



2                   The petitioner preferred an application for furlough.

The said application was rejected by order dated 2.2.2017,

hence, this petition.



3                   It is seen that against the order of rejection of


                                                                                                    1   of  2





              jdk                                                   2                                              15.crwp.3009.17.doc

furlough, appeal is provided. The petitioner has not exhausted

that remedy and has directly approached this Court. As the

petitioner has remedy of appeal available to him, we are not

inclined to interfere, hence, Rule is discharged. Petition is

disposed of accordingly.

[DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]

kandarkar

2 of 2

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter