Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 5385 Bom
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2016
WP 4542/15 1 Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION No. 4542/2015
Imam Shah Ibrahim Shah,
Age about 26 years, Occu: Service,
R/o Madar Tekdi Parpeth, Malkapur,
Dist. Buldana. PETITIONER
.....VERSUS.....
1. The State of Maharashtra,
Through its Secretary
Social Welfare Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400 032.
2. The Divisional Caste Scrutiny Committee-2,
Through its Member Secretary/President,
Administrative Building, 2nd Floor,
Collectorate Premises, Akola.
3. The Education Officer,
Office of the Primary Education Officer,
Hindu Colony, Municipal Corporation,
(School building), Lakhansi Napu Road,
Hindu Colony, Dadar East, Mumbai-440014.
4. The Administrative Officer (School),
P/N Ward, above ban dongri Marathi
Municipal School,
1st Floor, Daftri Road, Near Koshish
School, Malad (East), Mumbai-400 097. RESPONDENTS
Shri G.R. Kothari, Advocate holding for Shri V.R. Choudhari, counsel for the petitioner.
Shri P.S. Tembhare, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent nos.1 and 2.
CORAM :SMT.VASANTI A NAIK AND
KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.
DATE : 19 TH
SEPTEMBER, 2016.
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)
RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith. The petition is heard
finally at the stage of admission with the consent of the learned counsel
for the parties.
WP 4542/15 2 Judgment
2. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction against
the Scrutiny Committee to decide the caste claim of the petitioner within
a time frame. The petitioner seeks the protection of his services till his
caste claim is decided.
3. Shri Tembhare, the learned Assistant Government Pleader
appearing for the Scrutiny Committee, states on instructions that the
caste claim of the petitioner is pending before the Committee and the
same would be decided as early as possible.
4. In view of the statement made by the learned Assistant
Government Pleader, we allow the writ petition. The Scrutiny Committee
is directed to decide the caste claim of the petitioner within fifteen
months. Since the petitioner was not at fault in not producing the caste
validity certificate, we protect the services of the petitioner till his caste
claim is decided.
Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms with no order as
to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
WP 4542/15 3 Judgment
CERTIFICATE
I certify that this Judgment uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Judgment.
Uploaded by: Rohit D. Apte. Uploaded on : 21.09.2016.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!