Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 5254 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2016
1 wp4143.16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.4143 OF 2016
Dr.Dhanraj C. Sindhimeshram,
Aged about 58 years, Associate
Professor in Shivaji Science
College, Congress Nagar,
Nagpur. .......... PETITIONER
// VERSUS //
1.The State of Maharashtra,
Through its Principal Secretary.
Department of Higher and
Technical Education,
Mantralaya, Mumbai-400 032.
2. The Director of Higher
Education, State of Maharashtra,
Central Building, Pune-1.
3. The Joint Director of Higher
Education, State of Maharashtra,
Nagpur Division, Nagpur.
::: Uploaded on - 16/09/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 18/09/2016 00:39:32 :::
2 wp4143.16.odt
4. Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj
Nagpur University, Nagpur,
through its Registrar, having
Office at Nagpur.
5. Shri Shivaji Education Society's
Amravati's Shivaji Science
College, Congress Nagar,
through its Principal. .......... RESPONDENTS
____________________________________________________________
Mrs.T.D.Khade, Adv. for the Petitioner.
Mrs.Kalyani Deshpande, AGP for respondent nos. 1 to 3.
Mrs.R.V.Kamble, Adv. h/f. Ms Tajwar Khan, Adv.
for respondent no.4.
____________________________________________________________
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI
AND
V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED : 14th SEPTEMBER, 2016.
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per B.R. GAVAI, J) :
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard
finally by consent of the parties.
2. The facts in the present case are identical with
the facts in Sudamrao Keshawrao Aher and Others vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Others reported in
2014(1) ALL MR 697 : (Writ Petition No.10283 of 2012
3 wp4143.16.odt
decided by the High Court of Bombay, Bench at
Aurangabad on 21st November, 2013) and in Writ Petition
No.4628 of 2013 (Dr.Shripad Anandrao Sonegaonkar .vs.
State of Maharashtra and Others) decided by this Court on
27.1.2014.
4. In that view of the matter, the respondents are
directed to compute the amounts payable to the petitioner
in accordance with the Judgment and order passed by the
Division Bench of Aurangabad Bench in Writ Petition
No.10283 of 2012 and another and release the said amount
to the petitioner. The same shall be done within a period of
two months.
5. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is
disposed of. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms.
No order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
[jaiswal]
4 wp4143.16.odt
CERTIFICATE
I certify that this Judgment uploaded is a true and
correct copy of original signed Judgment.
Uploaded by : Jaiswal, P.S. Uploaded on : 16.9.2016.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!