Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6426 Bom
Judgement Date : 27 October, 2016
1 wp80.07
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.80 OF 2007
All India Schedule Caste/Schedule
Tribe & Backward Classes Employees
Coordination Council, 309,
Bipin Bihjari Ganguli Street,
Calcutta, Branch at Western Coal Field
Limited, Nagpur, Registration
No. S-2/963, through its Vice President
Umakant Gajanan Patil, aged about
45 years, occupation : Assistant
Engineer, Umred Area, Taluka : Umred,
District Nagpur. ... Petitioner
- Versus -
1) Chief Managing Director, Western
Coal Field, Coal Estate,
Civil Lines, Nagpur.
2) Chief General Manager, Umred Area,
Western Coal Field Limited,
Civil Lines, Nagpur.
3) Sub-Area Manager, Western
Coal Field Limited, Umred,
Sub Area, Umred, Taluka,
Umred, District Nagpur.
4) Sub-Area Manager, Makardhokada
Mines, Taluka : Umred, District :
Nagpur.
5) Sub Area Manager, Murpar,
Taluq : Chimur, District Chandrapur. ... Respondents
-----------------
None for the petitioner.
None for the respondents.
___________
::: Uploaded on - 27/10/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2016 01:05:30 :::
2 wp80.07
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND
KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.
DATED : OCTOBER 27, 2016
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER SMT. VASANTI A NAIK , J.) :
By this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a direction
against the respondents to refund the amount of wages (one day's salary)
that was deducted due to the festival, without the consent of the
employees concerned.
Without going into the correctness or otherwise of the action
on the part of the respondents, it would be necessary to dispose of the writ
petition as nearly 10 years have lapsed from the date of deduction of one
day's salary from the salary of the employees. The amount, which the
employees would have been required to pay as one day's salary, must not
be substantial. There is no stay operating in the matter. It is also not
known whether the respondents had decided to repay the deducted salary
to the members of the petitioner Council. Since the amount that was
deducted is less, it would not be proper to decide the issue involved in this
writ petition, more so when the parties are not represented in the Court
today.
Hence, by keeping the issue involved in the writ petition open,
we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!