Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6155 Bom
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2016
1 wp5056.05
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.5056 OF 2005
1) Ku. Chanda d/o Namdeo Doke,
aged about 36 years,
occupation : housewife,
r/o c/o A.S. Pangse, D.B. Pusadkar's
House, Mahadeo Nagar, Yavatmal,
Taluq and District Yavatmal.
2) Ku. Archana d/o Krishnarao Kadam,
aged about 30 years, occupation :
housewife, r/o c/o Namdeorao Doke,
At Post : Nandgaon Khandeshwar,
Taluq and District Amravati. ... Petitioners
- Versus -
1) Zilla Parishad, Yavatmal,
Taluq and District Yavatmal,
through its Chief Executive Officer.
2) The State of Maharashtra, through
its Secretary, Department of
Employment and Self Employment,
Mantralaya, Fort, Mumbai - 400 032. ... Respondents
-----------------
Shri A.V. Palshikar, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent
no.2.
----------------
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND
KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.
DATED : OCTOBER 18, 2016
2 wp5056.05
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER SMT. VASANTI A NAIK , J.) :
By this writ petition, the petitioners seek a direction against
the respondent no.1 Zilla Parishad to apply proper caste based reservation
while making appointments on the posts of Gram Sevaks in pursuance of
the advertisements dated 14/1/2003 and 26/5/2006. The petitioners also
seek a direction against the respondent no.1 Zilla Parishad to consider the
claim of the petitioners for the posts of Contract Gram Sevaks in
pursuance of the aforesaid advertisements.
Though this Court had issued rule in the writ petition, no
interim relief was granted in favour of the petitioners.
By the advertisements issued by the respondent no.1 Zilla
Parishad in the year 2003 and 2006, applications were invited for
appointment on the posts of Contract Gram Sevak on a fixed honorarium.
The advertisements provided that the reservation of the posts was made.
When the petitioners had applied in the year 2003, they were more than
30-35 years of age. As per the advertisements, the upper age limit of the
candidates belonging to the reserved categories was 35 years. The
petitioners must have attained the age of 40 years as on date. By the
concerned advertisements, appointments were sought to be made only on
contractual basis for a period of eleven months. A direction cannot be
issued against the respondent no.1 Zilla Parishad to properly apply the
caste based reservation in the absence of any advertisement issued by it
3 wp5056.05
after 2006. As and when an advertisement is issued, the petitioners are
entitled to challenge the same, if at all they are eligible for appointment
and if posts are not earmarked for the candidates belonging to the
reserved categories, in accordance with law.
Since the cause of action for filing the writ petition is rendered
infructuous due to passage of time, we dispose of the writ petition with no
order as to costs. Rule stands discharged.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!