Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6516 Bom
Judgement Date : 17 November, 2016
{1}
wp 11268.16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.11268 OF 2016
Archana D/o Ramrao Singanwad
@ Archana Shriniwas Andelwar
Age: 32 years, Occu: household,
R/o Chandola, Tq.Mukhed
Dist. Nanded Petitioner
Versus
1 The State of Maharashtra,
Tribal Development Department,
Through Its Secretary,
Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32
2 The Sub Divisional Officer,
Degloor, Tq. Degloor,
Dist. Nanded Respondents
Mr.P.V. Jadhavar advocate for the petitioner Mr.A.B. Girase, Government Pleader for Respondents
_______________
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL , JJ
(Date : 17th November, 2016.)
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: R.M. Borde, J)
1 Heard.
2 Rule. With the consent of the parties, petition is taken up
for final decision at admission stage.
3 The petitioner is objecting to the order passed by the Sub
{2} wp 11268.16.odt
Divisional Officer, Degloor, Dist. Nanded on 28.10.2016, refusing
to issue the caste certificate in favour of the petitioner, certifying
that she belongs to Mannervarlu, scheduled tribe.
4 The petitioner tendered proposal for issuance of caste
certificate to the Sub Divisional Officer in the month of July, 2016
together with necessary documents, supporting her claim. The
Sub Divisional Officer, however, rejected the application tendered
by the petitioner, solely on the ground that, the petitioner has
failed to tender documents prior to 6.9.1950 and that the
documents tendered by the petitioner are of recent past.
5 Time and again, it has been recorded by this Court in
several Judgments that, the competent authorities are required to
issue caste certificates on the basis of prima facie material and in-
depth enquiry at the stage of issuance of caste certificates is not
contemplated. The caste certificate issued to the individual is
always subject to scrutiny by the competent scrutiny committee
and individual is not entitled to claim benefits either in the matter
of education or employment or any other benefit under the
Government Policies unless, he possesses validation certificate.
6 In the instant matter, apart from the evidence for issuance
of caste certificate, validation certificate in favour of blood relation
{3} wp 11268.16.odt
i.e. real sister of the petitioner Viz. Veena Ramrao Singanwad was
produced. In our opinion, the petitioner has prima facie
established her claim for issuance of caste certificate and the
order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer is patently erroneous
and deserves to be quashed and set aside.
7 The order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Degloor
dated 28.10.2016 is quashed and set aside and the respondent
No.2 Sub Divisional Officer is directed to issue caste certificate in
the prescribed proforma, certifying that, the petitioner belongs to
Mannervarlu, scheduled tribe, within three days from today. It is
clarified that, the observations made in the instant order are on
the basis of prima facie consideration and scrutiny committee,
while conducting verification of the caste certificate, shall take
decision independently, without being influenced by the
observations made in the instant order.
8 Rule is accordingly made absolute. There shall be no order
as to costs.
(SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J) (R.M.BORDE, J)
vbd
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!