Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 3110 Bom
Judgement Date : 22 June, 2016
1 wp306.16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.306 OF 2016
Vijay Itwari Chavan,ig
Convict No.C/4210,
Presently at Central Prison,
Amravati. .......... PETITIONER
// VERSUS //
1. Deputy Inspector General (Prisons)
(East), Nagpur.
2. The Superintendent,
Central Prison, Amravati. .......... RESPONDENTS
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Mr.Mir Nagman Ali, Adv. for the petitioner.
Mrs. N.R.Tripathi, A.P.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
CORAM : B.R.GAVAI &
V.M.DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATE : 22.6.2016.
2 wp306.16.odt
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per V.M.Deshpande, J) :
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally
by the consent of the parties.
2. The application of the petitioner for grant of furlough
was rejected by the Authorities below on the ground that when
the petitioner was released on parole leave on 15.12.2014, at
that time, he was required to be brought back to the prison by
police after a period of 89 days and therefore, an offence under
Section 224 of the Indian Penal Code was also registered against
the petitioner.
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has invited our
attention to the Judgment delivered by the learned Magistrate in
Summary Criminal Case No.11384 of 2015, by which the
petitioner was prosecuted for the offence punishable under
Section 224 of the Indian Penal Code. He invites our attention to
paragraph no.11 of the Judgment. Perusal of the said Judgment
3 wp306.16.odt
shows that, during the period of leave, the petitioner was
suffering from Asthma, Blood Pressure and disease of chest and
therefore, he was taking necessary treatment from Medical
hospital, Nagpur. After the petitioner was arrested and when he
was taken to the hospital, there the doctor advised him for
admission. From the aforesaid, it is crystal clear that the
petitioner did not remain outside the prison after expiry of the
leave period on his own. However, due to the circumstances
mentioned above, he could not surrender. In that view of the
matter, the reasoning given by the Authorities cannot sustain in
the eye of law. Consequently, the Criminal Writ Petition is
allowed. The petitioner be released on furlough leave, as prayed
for, after observing the due process.
JUDGE JUDGE
* jaiswal
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!