Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Motilal S/O.Bherulal ... vs The Ex.Engg. B & C Div.No.1, ...
2016 Latest Caselaw 2872 Bom

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 2872 Bom
Judgement Date : 15 June, 2016

Bombay High Court
Motilal S/O.Bherulal ... vs The Ex.Engg. B & C Div.No.1, ... on 15 June, 2016
Bench: Ravi K. Deshpande
     sa437.97.J.odt                                                                                                                1/3



                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY




                                                                                                                
                               NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR




                                                                                 
                                     SECOND APPEAL NO.437 OF 1997


               Motilal s/o Bherulal Dave 
               (Since dead) thr. LRs.




                                                                                
     1]        Smt. Urmilabai wd/o Motilalji Dave,
               Aged 70 yrs.




                                                            
     2]        Shri Shantiprakash s/o Motilalji Dave,
               Aged 40 yrs.        
     3]        Sri Durgaprasad s/o Motilalji Dave,
               Aged 30 yrs.
                                  
     4]        Shri Pramodkumar s/o Motilalji Dave,
               Aged 24 yrs.
      

     5]        Smt. Shashikalabai Gaurishankar Dave,
               Aged 49 yrs.
   



     6]        Smt. Kaushalbai Rajendraji Dave,
               Aged 34 yrs.





     7]        Smt. Roshanibai Dipakji Joshi,
               Aged 27 yrs.

               All R/o C/o Smt. Urmilabai Motilalji Dave,
               Surendragad, Manav Seva Society,





               Seminary Hills, Nagpur.              ....... APPELLANTS

                                                ...V E R S U S...

              The Executive Engineer,
              B&C Division No.1, Sadar,
              Nagpur.                                            ....... RESPONDENT
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Shri Pradeep Marpakwar, Advocate for Appellants.
              Mrs. R.A. Deshpande, A.G.P. for Respondent.
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



    ::: Uploaded on - 17/06/2016                                                 ::: Downloaded on - 30/07/2016 05:27:57 :::
      sa437.97.J.odt                                                                                                                2/3

                          CORAM:  R.K. DESHPANDE, J. 

th JUNE, 2016.

                          DATE:      15




                                                                                                                
                                                                                 
     ORAL JUDGMENT



     1]                   The appellants in this appeal have furnished an undertaking




                                                                                

before this Court dated 09.06.2016 marked as 'X' for identification.

The terms of the undertaking are reproduced below:

1)

That, the appellant undertakes to make payment of Rs.25,000/- to the respondent B&C Division No. 1, Sadar,

Nagpur towards full and final settlement of all arrears of rent within a period of one month.

2) That, the appellant shall vacate the premises in their

possession i.e. the lease premises within period of six months from today.

3) In the meantime of this six months period the appellant shall make fresh application for renewal/fresh lease of suit premises to the respondent which would be considered by the

B&C Division No. 1, Sadar, Nagpur in accordance with law on fresh term and execution of lease deed therefor in accordance with law.

2] Initially, the matter was adjourned for taking instructions

from the appellants for filing such undertaking. Some of the appellants

thereafter remained present before this Court and agreed for furnishing

an undertaking. The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the

undertaking is signed by all the appellants. Hence, the learned Assistant

sa437.97.J.odt 3/3

Government Pleader submits, on taking instructions, that the

respondents have no objection for disposing of the matter and taking on

record the alleged undertaking so furnished.

3] In view of above, the second appeal stands disposed of in

terms of the aforesaid undertaking. The parties to act upon the terms

and conditions.

                                         ig                                            JUDGE
                                       
    NSN
      
   







 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter