Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shravan Kadu Bhoi vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...
2016 Latest Caselaw 4036 Bom

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4036 Bom
Judgement Date : 21 July, 2016

Bombay High Court
Shravan Kadu Bhoi vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 21 July, 2016
Bench: R.M. Borde
                                                                                 WP 690/16  
      
                                                   - 1 -

                         




                                                                                   
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                         BENCH AT AURANGABAD               




                                                           
                                                  
                               WRIT PETITION NO.690/2016

                      Shravan Kadu Bhoi,




                                                          
                      age 59 yrs., occu.agri.,
                      r/o village Purnad
                      Tq.Mukatainagar Dist.Jalgaon.     
                                         ...Petitioner..
                             Versus




                                               
                              1]    ig  The State of Maharashtra,
                                        through Secretary,
                                        Irrigation Department,
                                        Mantralaya, Mumbai.
                                  
                              2]        The Collector, Jalgaon.
                                        Dist.Jalgaon.

                              3]        Special Land Acquisition Officer and
      


                                        Sub-Divisional Officer,
                                        Division Bhusawal Dist.Jalgaon.
   



                              4]
                        Executive Engineer,
                        Sardar Sarovar Project,
                        Division Jalgaon, Jalgaon. 





                                               ...Respondents... 
                                                                   
                                   .....
    Shri A.B. Kale, Advocate for petitioner.
    Shri V.M. Kagne, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3.





    Smt.Chaitali   Kutti   -   Choudhary,   Advocate   for   respondent 
    no.4. 
                                   .....
      
                                     CORAM: R.M. BORDE &
                                             K.L. WADANE, JJ. 

DATE: 21.07.2016

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per Borde, J.):

WP 690/16

- 2 -

1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. Rule. Rule

made returnable forthwith and with the consent of learned

counsel for the parties, the petition is taken for final

hearing at the stage of admission.

2] The petitioner is objecting to the award passed on

11.9.2014 by the respondent no.3 determining the amount

of compensation in respect of the acquired land. The

petitioner contends that the First Schedule of the Right

to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land

Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013,

contains a component of compensation package in respect

of the land acquired under the said Act and the manner of

determination of value thereof. Entries 2 and 3 of the

First Schedule prescribe the multiplier factor, which is

required to be applied for determination of amount of

land value. So far as the lands situated in rural area

are concerned, the State shall have to accord

compensation by application of Factor 2. In the instant

matter, the Land Acquisition Officer has determined the

amount of land value at the rate of Rs.360/- per

sq.meter, but has not applied the multiplier factor

prescribed under First Schedule of the Land Acquisition

WP 690/16

- 3 -

Act.

3] A notification issued by the State of Maharashtra

prescribes multiplier Factor 2 applicable to the rural

areas and as such it was obligatory on the part of the

Land Acquisition Officer to determine the amount of

compensation by application of relevant multiplier

factor and compute the amount of compensation and pay the

same to the petitioner. This legal objection has not

been seriously controverted by the respondents.

4] In this view of the matter, the award passed by the

Land Acquisition Officer deserves to be set aside only to

the extent of determination of amount of compensation.

The respondent nos.2 and 3 are, therefore, directed to

determine the amount of compensation by application of

multiplier Factor 2 contained in First Schedule at Entry

Nos.2 and 3 of the Land Acquisition Act and as notified

by the State Government on 26.5.2015. The respondent

nos.2 and 3 shall re-determine the amount of compensation

by taking into consideration the relevant multiplier

Factor 2 as prescribed under the notification as

expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period

of eight weeks from today. On re-determination of the

WP 690/16

- 4 -

land value in observance of the directions of this Court,

the respondent no.4 shall pay the amount so determined

within a period of eight weeks from such determination.

5] Rule is accordingly made absolute. There shall be

no order as to costs.

(K.L. WADANE, J.) ig (R.M. BORDE, J.)

ndk/c2171627.doc

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter