Thursday, 30, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Parshuram Daga Patil vs The Agriculture Produce Market ...
2016 Latest Caselaw 7250 Bom

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 7250 Bom
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2016

Bombay High Court
Parshuram Daga Patil vs The Agriculture Produce Market ... on 15 December, 2016
Bench: R.V. Ghuge
                                                                       WP/3133/1997
                                            1

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                               BENCH AT AURANGABAD




                                                                               
                             WRIT PETITION NO. 3133 OF 1997




                                                       
                                          WITH
                           CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8068 OF 2006

     1. The Agriculture Produce
     Market Committee, Dhule.




                                                      
     2. The Sabhapati,
     The Agriculture Produce
     Market Committee, Dhule.                                    ..Petitioners




                                          
     Versus
                             
     Shri Parshuram Daga Patil,
     Age 58 years, R/o CTS No.2648,
     Lane No.5, Near Mirchaya Maruti,
     At Dhule.                                                   ..Respondent
                            
                                           ...
                                      None present.
                                           ...
      


                              CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

Dated: December 15, 2016

...

ORAL JUDGMENT:-

1. None appears for the litigating sides.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the ad-interim order dated

13.2.1997 below Exhibit U/2 and the order dated 20.3.1997 below

Exhibit U/2 passed by the Industrial Court, Nasik in Complaint (ULP)

No.138 of 1997.

WP/3133/1997

3. By the impugned orders, the Industrial Court has ordered as

under:-

"1. The order dated 13.2.1997 is confirmed.

2. In view of the fact that, the complainant though suspended pending issuance of charge - sheet, and enquiry, in fact, had not been issued with any charge sheet and no

enquiry was initiated against him, the respondents are directed to pay the complainant full backwages from the date

of his suspension, i.e. 6.7.1981 within seven days from the date of this Order.

3. The respondents are further directed to consider the salary of he complainant, as and when it might have been

increased by way of either granting annual increment or by way of any settlement within the workers or Union.

4. The respondents are further directed to pay costs of RS.5,000/- to the complainant for all mental harassments and

agony caused to him during the proceeding."

4. This petition was admitted on 1.12.1997 and by way of interim

relief, the impugned orders were stayed in terms of prayer clause

D(b). It appears that pursuant to the interim relief granted by this

Court, the interim orders have been stayed. However, this Court has

not stayed Complaint (ULP) No.138 of 1997.

WP/3133/1997

5. In the light of the above, since the interim orders have been

stayed for the past more than 19 years, I do not deem it proper to

vacate the interim relief granted by this Court. Ends of justice would

be met by continuing the interim relief so as to enable the Industrial

Court, Dhule (which has been subsequently established for the

District of Dhule) to proceed to decide Complaint (ULP) No.138 of

1997, which must have been transferred from Nasik to Dhule.

6.

In the light of the above, this petition is partly allowed. The

interim relief granted in terms of prayer clause D(b) shall stand

continued till the disposal of Complaint (ULP) No.138 of 1997, which

shall be disposed off by the Industrial Court, Dhule as expeditiously

as possible and preferably within a period of six months from today,

if not already decided. Needless to state, if the said complaint is

already decided, this interim relief granted earlier by this Court

would cease to continue as it would merge in the final judgment of

the Industrial Court.

7. Rule is made partly absolute accordingly.

8. Pending Civil Application stands disposed off.

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) ...

akl/d

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter