Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anil S/O. Jagannath Deowar vs The State Of Maharashtra, Through ...
2016 Latest Caselaw 6974 Bom

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6974 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2016

Bombay High Court
Anil S/O. Jagannath Deowar vs The State Of Maharashtra, Through ... on 6 December, 2016
Bench: Ravi K. Deshpande
      wp2845.16.J.odt                                                                                                1/3




               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY




                                                                                                              
                         NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR




                                                                               
                               WRIT PETITION NO.2845 OF 2016

                Anil s/o Jagannath Deowar,
                Aged about 40 years,




                                                                              
                Occ: Cultivation,
                R/o Bhimni, Post-Ghatkul,
                Tah. Pombhurna,
                Dist. Chandrapur.                                               ....... PETITIONER




                                                           
                                                ...V E R S U S...

     1]
                                  
                The State of Maharashtra through
                Additional Collector, Chandrapur.
                                 
     2]         Ranjit s/o Sambhashiv Pimpalshende,
                Aged-major, R/o Bhimni,
                Post-Ghatkul, Tah. Pombhurna,
                Dist. Chandrapur.
      


     3]       The Commissioner,
   



              Nagpur Division, Nagpur.                           ....... RESPONDENTS
     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Shri Rohit Joshi, Advocate for Petitioner.
              Shri D.P. Thakare, Addl. Govt. Pleader for Respondent 





              Nos.1 and 3.
              Shri S.O. Ahmed, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                          CORAM:  R.K. DESHPANDE, J. 
                                        th       DECEMBER, 2016.
                          DATE:      6

     ORAL JUDGMENT



     1]                   Rule made returnable forthwith. The learned counsels

appearing for the respondents waive service of notice.

wp2845.16.J.odt 2/3

Heard finally by consent of the learned counsels appearing for the

parties.

2] The challenge in this petition is to the order dated

12.05.2016 passed by the Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur

rejecting the application for stay holding that there is no prima

facie case, balance of convenience and the reason founded.

The order is virtually without any reasons. The order nowhere

considers what the prima faice case is and on this ground only the

order needs to be set aside. The Commissioner is supposed to

consider the matter on merits even to satisfy on the prima facie,

case in the light of the relevant provisions of the Act. This exercise

has not been carried out. The order therefore, needs to be set

aside.

3] The appeal is pending before the Commissioner and

this Court had passed an interim order on 17.05.2016 staying the

effect, operation and implementation of the order dated

30.04.2016 passed by the Additional Collector, Chandrapur

disqualifying the petitioner from the post of Member, Gram

Panchayat. The interim order passed by this Court shall continue

till the final disposal of the appeal by the Commissioner.

           wp2845.16.J.odt                                                                                                3/3

      4]                      In the result, the writ petition is allowed. The order




                                                                                                                  

dated 12.05.2016 passed by the Commissioner Nagpur Division,

Nagpur in G.P. Appeal No.104/2016 is hereby quashed and set

aside. The interim order granted by this Court staying the effect

and operation of the order of disqualification dated 30.04.2016

passed by the Collector shall continue to operate pending the

decision of the appeal. The Commissioner to decide the appeal

within a period of six months from the date of first appearance of

the parties. The parties to appear before the Additional

Commissioner on 19.12.2016. No costs.

JUDGE

NSN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter