Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6861 Bom
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2016
986_WP528016.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5280 OF 2016
Trimbak Bhika Gadhe
Age: 76 years, Occu.: Agri.,
R/o Ladgaon, Tal. Vaijapur,
Dist. Aurangabad. ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
1. State of Maharashtra
Through the Irrigation Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.
2. The Special Land Acquisition Officer,
J.P. No.2, Collector Office, Aurangabad.
(This office is abolished from August 2013
and at present new office addressee is)
The Deputy Collector (Land Acquisitio)
Sub Divisional Office, Vaijapur,
Tal. Vaijapur, Dist. Aurangabad.
3. The Executive Engineer (Irrigation)
Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. ..RESPONDENTS
....
Mr. N.J. Pahune Patil, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. S.K. Tambe, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Mr. M.S. Deshpande, Advocate h/f Mr. D.B Pawar, Advocate for
Respondent No.3.
....
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J.
DATED : 01st DECEMBER, 2016
ORAL JUDGMENT :
1 / 3
986_WP528016.odt
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent heard both
sides for final disposal.
2. Present proceeding is filed to challenge the award made before
the National Lok Adalat for settlement which took place in L.A.R. No. 489
of 2010 on 23rd November, 2013. The matter was pending in the Court
from Aurangabad. As per the contents of the form, initially the amount of
Rs.1,000/- per R was written but by scratching that amount which was
also in words new amount of Rs.121/- per R is written. It is the
contentions of the present petitioner - original plaintiffs that he had never
agreed to accept compensation of Rs.121/- per R. It was submitted to this
Court by learned Counsel and record was shown which is to the effect
that Special Land Acquisition Officer granted compensation @ Rs. 640/-
per R. It appears that when the proceeding was filed as M.A.N.R.J.I. No.
4 of 2014 before the same Court - Reference Court, the Court refused to
interfere by holding that it was award given by Lok Adalat and there was
no jurisdiction to the Court to interfere in the award.
3. After hearing and submissions made by both sides, this Court
holds that there is possibility of mistake though there is no possibility of
fraud and so the award needs to be set aside and the matter needs to be
2 / 3
986_WP528016.odt
returned back to the Reference Court for decision on merits. In the result,
petition is allowed. Award granted in Lok Adalat in the matter L.A.R. No.
489 of 2010 (Old No. 148 of 2005) is hereby set aside and the matter is
restored to his original number for decision. Rule made absolute in those
terms.
( T.V. NALAWADE, J. ) SSD
3 / 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!