Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prabhakar Panjabrao Lohkare vs State Of Mah. Thr. Its Secty. And ...
2016 Latest Caselaw 4733 Bom

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4733 Bom
Judgement Date : 19 August, 2016

Bombay High Court
Prabhakar Panjabrao Lohkare vs State Of Mah. Thr. Its Secty. And ... on 19 August, 2016
Bench: B.R. Gavai
                                           1                  WP3913-12.odt         



             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY




                                                                           
                               NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR




                                                   
                               Writ Petition No.3913/2012
                                            ...




                                                  
    Prabhakar Panjabrao Lohkare,
    Aged about 73 years,
    Occupation: Pensioner,
    R/o Plot No.28, Baba Faridnagar,
    Near Railway Crossing,




                                               
    Zingabai Takli, Nagpur.                       ..             PETITIONER
                              ig   .. Versus ..
                            
    1. State of Maharashtra,
       through its Secretary,
       Industries, Power and Labour
       Department Mantralaya,
       Mumbai 400 032.
      


    2. Maharashtra State Electricity
   



       Transmission Company Limited,
       (M.S.E.T.C.L.) (MAHATRANSCO)
       Extra High Voltage Construction-
       cum-Operation and Maintenance





       Zone, through its Chief Engineer,
       Ingole Bhavan, Faras,
       Chhindwara Road, Mankapur,
       Nagpur.

    3. Neha Construction Company,





       G-4, Mahalaxmi Apartments,
       Khare Town, Dharampeth,
       Nagpur.

    4. Union of India, through its
       Secretary, Ministry of Shipping,
       Road Transport and Highways,
       New Delhi.

    5. Collector,
       Nagpur, Tahsil & District Nagpur.          ..         RESPONDENTS




    ::: Uploaded on - 22/08/2016                   ::: Downloaded on - 23/08/2016 00:16:53 :::
                                        2                          WP3913-12.odt         



    Mr. A.R. Ingole, Advocate for Petitioner.
    Mr. N.M. Ekre, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 & 5.




                                                                               
    Mr. G.E. Moharir, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
                         ....




                                                       
                  CORAM : B.R. Gavai & Z.A. Haq, JJ.

DATED : August 19, 2016.

ORAL JUDGMENT (per B.R. Gavai, J. )

1. Not on board. Taken on board.

2.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by

consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3. The petitioner has approached this Court for direction to

respondent no.5- Collector, Nagpur to decide the representation

dated 17.03.2012 made by the petitioner for grant of

compensation in view of the Government Resolution dated

1.11.2010.

4. It is the contention of the petitioner that the transmission

towers were erected on the land owned by the petitioner and as

such the petitioner would be entitled to grant of compensation in

view of the G.R. dated 1.11.2010.



    5.            The perusal of the G.R. dated 1.11.2010 would                     reveal

    that      whenever the transmission towers are erected by the





                                    3                         WP3913-12.odt         


Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Limited, the

compensation should be granted for erecting such towers as per

the rates specified in the G.R. dated 1.11.2010.

6. Since it is not disputed that the towers are erected on

the land owned by the petitioner, we allow the petition and direct

respondent no.5- Collector, Nagpur to quantify the claim of the

petitioner towards compensation for the user of the land for

erection of the towers. We direct that such quantification shall be

done by respondent no.5 within a period of six weeks from today

after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and

respondent no.2. Respondent no.2 is directed to make payment of

the compensation to the petitioner within a period of six weeks

from the date of the determination of the compensation by

respondent no.5.

7. The petitioner and respondent no.2 shall appear before

respondent no.5 or the authority to whom the powers are

delegated by him on 29.08.2016 at 11 a.m.

8. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms with no

order as to costs.

         (Z.A. Haq, J. )                    (B.R. Gavai, J.)
                                        ...





                                            4                     WP3913-12.odt         




                                                                              
                                   Certificate




                                                      

I certify that this judgment uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Judgment.

Uploaded by : R.G. Halwai, Uploaded on : 22.08.2016

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter