Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4542 Bom
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2016
wp431-16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.431 OF 2016
Mangesh Madhav Kapate,
Aged about 40 years,
Convicted Prisoner bearing Prisoner
No.C-8253, Central Prison, Nagpur. .... ... Petitioner.
..Versus..
1. Divisional Commissioner,
Nagpur Division, Nagpur.
2. Police Statio, M.I.D.C.,
3. Superintendent, Nagpur Centra,l Prison,
Naglpur. ... ... Respondents.
.......................................................................................................................................................
Mr. Rohan Chhabra, Advocate (appointed) for petitioner.
Mr. M.J. Khan, APP for respondents.
.......................................................................................................................................................
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND V.M. DESHPANDE,
JJ.
DATE : 8 th
August, 2016.
JUDGMENT (Per B.R. Gavai, J.)
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of
learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. The petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the
rejectionof hisj applicationfor grant of parole. The parole is sought on the
.....2/-
wp431-16
ground that the petitioner's mother was murdered by his father and his
brother.
3. The perusal of the letter dated 20.12.2015 would reveal that as a
matter of fact the concerned police station has not opposed the release of the
applicant. However, it was rejected on the ground that when petitioner was
earlier released on furlough, he was arrested after a period of 20 days.
4. It is the contention of the petitioner that he is required to
perform religious ceremony and Asthi Visarjan of his mother and the same is
not disputed by the respondents.
5. In that view of the matter, we are inclined to allow the writ
petition. As such, the petition is allowed. The applicant is directed to be
released on parole for a period of 15 days after complying with the
requirements as provided under the law. Fees to be paid to the appointed
counsel are quantified at Rs.1,500/-.
JUDGE JUDGE
Hirekhan
.....3/-
wp431-16
CERTIFICATE
I certify that this Judgment uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Judgment.
Uploaded by : R.B. Hirekhan. Uploaded on : 10/8/2016.
ig P.A.
.....4/-
wp431-16
...../-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!