Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9978 AP
Judgement Date : 6 November, 2024
APHC010027052002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3369]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 891/2002
Between:
V. Venkata Ramanamma & 4 Or ...APPELLANT
AND
K Venkata Rattamma W/o Chinnaiah ...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G KRISHNA MURTHY
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. M RAMAIAH
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT:
The Second Appeal is preferred by the appellants against the
judgment and decree dated 31.07.2002, passed in A.S.No.7 of 1994 on
the file of the Senior Civil Judge Court, Kandukur, reversing the
judgment and decree dated 22.03.1994 passed in O.S.No.276 of 1990
on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Kandukur.
2. On being represented by learned counsel for the appellants that he
has no instructions, this Court ordered notice to the appellants but the notice were returned with an endorsement 'Addressee left without
instructions'. It was also represented that the appellant No.3 died. Till
today, the legal representatives of deceased 3rd appellant have not come
forward to pursue the matter. It seems that the legal representatives of
deceased 3rd appellant and other appellants have not evinced any
interest to pursue the matter. Hence, this Court has no other alternative
except to dismiss the appeal.
3. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. There
shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand
closed.
________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J
Date: 06.11.2024 MKK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!