Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10526 AP
Judgement Date : 20 November, 2024
::1::
APHC010034522023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3329]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU
NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 1702/2023
Between:
M/s.koushik Group ...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P KAMLAKAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. E V JAGANNADHA RAO (SC FOR AP STATE HOUSEING
COOP LTD)
2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
3. GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
4. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
5. SULTANA SHAIK
::2::
The Court made the following
ORDER:
The petitioner had been awarded various works contract for
printing of different Government Schemes and Welfare measures
through Bus Branding, CCTV, Digital Wall Painting. After execution
of the said contracts, final bills were prepared for a sum total of
Rs.4,39,09,688/- as per the sanctioned orders. The Petitioner
company has executed the same strictly in terms of the work order.
Thereafter, the petitioner company has submitted its bills/invoices as
well as submitted its representations requesting them to pay the bill
amounts. Since there is no response from the concerned
authorities, the petitioner firm submitted its reminder on 11.11.2022
requesting to release the payment against the execution of works.
Even after the said reminder by the petitioner company, there is no
response from the concerned authorities. As the payment of the
said amount has not been made by the respondents, the petitioner
has approached this Court by way of this writ petition.
2. It is the contention of the petitioner that even though the
respondents admitted that the petitioner is entitled for payment of the
aforesaid sum of money, no payment is being made. The petitioner ::3::
contends that such non-payment of money is clearly arbitrary and
high-handed requiring the interference of this Court.
3. This Court, in various orders, including the judgment of a
learned Single Judge of this Court dated 05.10.2021 in
W.P.No.10038 of 2021 and batch had taken the view that such non-
payment of dues is arbitrary and that such dues need to be cleared
by the respondents at the earliest.
4. On the other hand, Counter affidavit has been filed by
Respondents while admitting about the claim of the petitioner, he
would submit that, since the budget was not released by the
Government, the bills were not paid to the petitioner. Soon after
release of the budget by the Government, the bills will be paid to the
petitioner.
5. In view of the aforesaid directions of this Court in various
cases and after hearing the submissions of learned counsel for the
petitioner and learned Government Pleader for the Respondents,
this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to
release the amount of Rs.4,39,09,688/- to the petitioner along with
the interest @ 6% per annum, in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble
Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No.724 of 2021 and
batch dated 12.10.2023, within a period of three (3) months from the ::4::
date of receipt of a copy of this order. It would also be open to the
petitioner to agitate his claim for higher rate of interest, if any
payable by the respondents, in an appropriate forum. There shall be
no order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this
Writ Petition shall stand closed.
________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
20th November, 2024 krk ::5::
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
20th November, 2024 krk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!