Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. Sapthagiri Traders, vs The Assistant Commissioner State Taxes ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 10524 AP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10524 AP
Judgement Date : 20 November, 2024

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

M/S. Sapthagiri Traders, vs The Assistant Commissioner State Taxes ... on 20 November, 2024

Author: R. Raghunandan Rao

Bench: R Raghunandan Rao

APHC010354562024
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                 AT AMARAVATI                      [3508]
                          (Special Original Jurisdiction)

           WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER
                TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

                                PRESENT

        THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

   THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

        WRIT PETITION NOs: 18056, 18107, 18138 & 18148 of 2024

Between:

M/s. Sapthagiri Traders,                                   ...PETITIONER

                                  AND

The Assistant Commissionerstate Taxes Dept and        ...RESPONDENT(S)

Others

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SRINIVASA RAO KUDUPUDI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. VENNA HEMANTH KUMAR(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL)

2. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX

The Court made the following common order:

In all these cases, the orders of assessment under the G.S.T Act are

challenged. Though various grounds of challenge were raised, the common

and primary ground is that impugned assessment orders are not signed and

do not have any DIN number.

2. A perusal of the orders would show that there is no signature of

the assessing officer nor is there any DIN number or unique number affixed on

the said orders.

3. This Court, in W.P.No.15446 of 2024, had considered the

question of the effect of the absence of signature and DIN number in an

assessment order, passed under the GST Act. By Judgment dated

13.11.2024, this Court had held that any assessment order which is passed

without a signature of the assessing officer or without a DIN or Unique number

being affixed on the order, would be a non est order.

4. In view of the absence of both DIN and signature on the orders,

these Writ Petitions are allowed setting aside the assessment orders and

remanding the said assessments back to the Assessing Officers for passing

orders on merits, after opportunity, being given to the petitioner and by affixing

signatures and DIN numbers on the said orders.

As sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There

shall be no order as to costs.

________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J

_____________________________ MAHESWARARAO KUNCHEAM, J

RJS HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

& HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

WRIT PETITION NOs: 18056, 18107, 18138 & 18148 of 2024

(per Hon'ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)

Dt: 20.11.2024

RJS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter