Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10494 AP
Judgement Date : 19 November, 2024
APHC010242252002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3369]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 327/2002
Between:
J.venkata Krsihna Murty ...APPELLANT
AND
Smt Chintala Kanakamma Ors ...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. TURAGA SAI SURYA
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. D JAIPAL REDDY
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT:
The Second Appeal is preferred by the appellant against the
judgment and decree dated 24.09.2001, passed in A.S.No.08 of 1998 on
the file of the II Additional District Judge, Krishna District, Vijayawada,
which was filed against the judgment and decree dated 31.01.1998,
passed in O.S.No.16 of 1990 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge,
Nuzvid.
2. On 25.09.2024, learned counsel for the appellant reported that he
had no instructions from the party and as such he reported no
instructions. Based on the said submissions of learned counsel for the
appellant, this Court ordered notice to the appellant, but the notice sent
was returned with an endorsement 'refused to receive'. It seems that
appellant has no interest to prosecute the appeal.
3. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. There
shall be no order as to costs.
Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand
closed.
________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J
Date: 19.11.2024 MKK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!