Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Begineni Munemma, vs Bagineni Pedda Balaiah,
2024 Latest Caselaw 1346 AP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1346 AP
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2024

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Begineni Munemma, vs Bagineni Pedda Balaiah, on 16 February, 2024

APHC010126882007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                               :: AMARAVATI
                       (Special Original Jurisdiction)                       [
                                                                         3397
                                                                             ]
                       FRIDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
                          TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
                                  PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA
                           RAO

                     FIRST APPEAL NO: 691 OF 2007

Appeal against the Judgment and Decree Dated 6/08/2007 in OS.No.111 of
2003 on the file of the Court of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, (fast Track
Court), Nandyal, Kurnool District.

Between:
  1. Begineni Munemma,, S/o.Pedda Chenchanna R/o.Nanivargam (V),
     Banaganapalli Mandal, Now working as Panchayat Secretary at
     R.Pampalli, Uyyalawada (M), Kurnool District.
   2. Manda Ramudu,, S/o.Venkatapathy Agriculturist R/o.Nanivargam
      (V), Banaganapalli Mandal, Kurnool District.
   3. Manda Pedda Kondanna,, S/o.Venkatapathy R/o.Mahanandi (M),
      Working as Clerk in Sri Mahanendeeswara Swamy Temple,
      Mahanandi Kurnool District.
   4. Manda    Chinna     Kondanna,,    S/o.Venkatapathy     Agriculturist
      R/o.Nanivargam (V), Banaganapalli Mandal, Kurnool District.

                                                             ...APPELLANT(S)
                                   AND
   1. Bagineni Pedda Balaiah, S/o.Pedda Chenchanna R/o.Nandivargam
      (V), Banaganapalli Mandal, Kurnool District.
   2. Bagineni Subbarayudu, S/o.Chinna Balaiah Agriculturists
      R/o.Nandivargam (V), Banaganapalli Mandal, Kurnool District.
   3. Bagineni Nageseshudu, S/o.Chinna Balaiah Agriculturists
      R/o.Nandivargam (V), Banaganapalli Mandal, Kurnool District.
   4. Bagineni Nagaraju, S/o.Chinna Balaiah Agriculturists
      R/o.Nandivargam (V), Banaganapalli Mandal, Kurnool District.
   5. Bagineni Sudhakar, S/o.Chinna Balaiah Agriculturists
      R/o.Nandivargam (V), Banaganapalli Mandal, Kurnool District.

                                                            ...RESPONDENTS

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2012(ASMP. NO: 3229 OF 2012)
       Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may
be pleased amend the prayer in ASMP No.3016/2012 in AS No.691/2007
by substitution of A3 to A6 forA5 to A7 wherever is mentioned in the
affidavit and prayer

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2009(ASMP. NO: 383 OF 2009)

      Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may
be pleased to permit the petitioner to substitute the certified copies to the
originals Ex B37 to B44 in O.S.No. 111 of 2003 on the file of the
Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal and return the originals Ex B37 to
B44 to the petitioners / respondents.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2012(ASMP. NO: 3016 OF 2012)

      Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may
be pleased permit the petitioenrs to substitute the certified copies of the
originals Exd.A5 to A7 in OS No.111/2003 on the file of the court of the
Addl.Senior Civil Judge, FTC., Nandyal

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2007(ASMP. NO: 2676 OF 2007)

      Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may
be pleased To direct the Respondents not to create or alienate any 3rd
party interest of the auit schedule property and pass such other order or
orders as is may deem fit pending the disposal of A.S.

I.A. NO: 4 OF 2007(ASMP. NO: 16209 OF 2007)

      Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may
be pleased

Counsel for the Appellant(s):SRI. KARRI MURALI KRISHNA

Counsel for the Respondents: P GANGA RAMI REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: 804/P GANGA RAMI REDDY

The Court made the following:
 JUDGMENT:

1. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel

for the appellants as well as the respondents have represented that

the matter has been settled between both the parties out of the Court

and requested to permit them to withdraw the appeal suit.

2. The representation by the learned counsel for the appellants is

recorded.

3. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No

costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand

closed.

_____________________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO

Date: 16.02.2024 SRT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter