Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1287 AP
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI [ 3397 ]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
FIRST APPEAL NO: 649 OF 2005
Appeal against the Judgement and Decree of the learned SCJ, Gudur in
O.S.NO.30/2001 dated 30/04/2005
Between:
1. Gudur Narayanamma, W/o Dhanunjaya R/o 5/82, Mosque Street, Gudur,
Nellore District
...APPELLANT(S)
AND
1. Kosuru Manjula Devi, W/o K.V. Narsimham R/o Mithapalem, Gudur, Nellore
District.
...RESPONDENTS
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2005(ASMP. NO: 1967 OF 2005)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To
condone the delay of 17 days in preparing the above appeal.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(ASMP. NO: 1753 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased fix
an early date of hearing of the above appeal in this Hon'ble Court
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2005(ASMP. NO: 2157 OF 2005)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the delivery of Judgment in
O.S.No.30 of 2001 dated 30.4.2005 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Gudur,
Nellore District and to pass.
Counsel for the Appellant(s):SRI. R RAVI KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondents: SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY
Counsel for the Respondents: 6444/SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
1. On the earlier occasion i.e., on 01.02.2024, learned counsel for the
respondent represented that the sole appellant died on 13.01.2023 and the matter
was directed to be posted today for taking steps by the learned counsel for the
appellant.
2. Today when the matter is called for hearing, there is no representation on
behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant.
3. Since the sole appellant is no more and no steps are being taken by the
learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal stands abated. Therefore, the appeal is
dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
____________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Dt.15.02.2024.
CVD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!