Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Limited vs Cb Cid, State Of Telangana
2024 Latest Caselaw 1150 AP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1150 AP
Judgement Date : 12 February, 2024

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Limited vs Cb Cid, State Of Telangana on 12 February, 2024

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI                 [ 3310 ]
                                  (Special Original Jurisdiction)




                  MONDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
                    TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

                                      PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

                        WRIT PETITION NO: 18009 OF 2014

Between:
   1. Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Limited, First Floor. Elegance Tower Plot No. 8.
      Non Hierarchical Commercial Centre Jasola. New Delhi 110 025 Represented
      by authorized representative Ms. Varsha Chaudhary.
   2. William Scott Pinckney, S/o Mr. Bernard Ross Pinckncy Chief Executive Officer
      Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Limited R /a First Floor_ Elegance Tower Plot
      No. 5. Non Hierarchical Commercial Centre Jasola, Ncw Delhi 110 025. (Since
      being in judicial custody Represented by his next Friend Ms.Varsha Chaudhary.

                                                                    ...PETITIONER(S)
                                     AND
   1. CB CID State of Telangana, Rep by Additional Director General of Police
      Hyderabad
   2. Station House Officer, Kurnool IITown Police Station kurnool District.
   3. Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District

                                                                    ...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction and more particularly one in the nature of writ of "Mandamus" declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing proceedings vide letter Nos. C.No.197/Cr.I/DCRI3/KUR/2014 dated 31-05-2014, communication to State Bank of India, Mumhai Branch, seeking freezing of the hank accounts of the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and without jurisdiction and consequently, set aside the same and pass such order or other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems lit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

I.A. NO: 3 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 29000 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the petitioner to amend the cause title and denote "State of Andhra Pradesh" after the words "Kurnool District" in relation to the description of 2nd and 3rd respondent

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 22580 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend operation of the letters so issued by the 3rd respondent vide letter Nos.C.No.197/Cr.1/1)C1213/KIJR/2014 dated 31-05-2014 permitting the Petitioner to operate their bank accounts and pass such order or other .orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

I.A. NO: 4 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 29001 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner herein to file a copy of the FIR No.311 of 2013 dated 29.12.2013 on the file of 2nd respondent as additional material papers

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 28999 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the "State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad" as 4th respondent in the writ appeal

Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. VARUN BYREDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP)

The Court made the following Order:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel

appearing for the petitioners submitted that a similar issue has fallen

for consideration before the Division Bench of this Court in

W.A.Nos.1059, 1060 and 1083 of 2014 and the Division Bench of this

Court was pleased to dispose of the Writ Appeals vide common

judgment dated 10.09.2014 and therefore, the present Writ Petition also

deserves to be disposed.

2. In view of the said submission, the Writ Petition dieserves to be

disposed of by following the order, dated 10.09.2014 in W.A.Nos.1059,

1060 and 1083 of 2014. However, the bank guarantee furnished by the

petitioner shall continue till the adjudication of the trial in C.C.No.105

of 2008 on the file of the Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Kurnool.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall

stand closed.

____________________________ Dr. K. MANMADHA RAO, J

12th February, 2024 BMS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter