Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1141 AP
Judgement Date : 12 February, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI [ 3397 ]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
FIRST APPEAL NO: 643 OF 2001
Appeal against the decree and judgment in O.S.No.375 of 1986 on the file of the
Court of the Ist Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, dated 1-7-1995
Between:
1. Palakodeti Bharadwaja, S/o Dr. Sivaraman Engineer R/o U.S.A., rep. by
G.P.A.Holder Ranga Rao
...APPELLANT(S)
AND
1. Dr Palakodeti Sivaraman, S/o Krishna Rao R/o Paedistrician, Lawsons Bay
Colony, Visakhapatnam
2. Palakodeti Visweswari Sivaraman, W/o Dr. Sivaraman Asst. Director Nursing
D.M.Y.H. Office, Lawsons Bay Colony, Visakhapatnam
3. Palakodeti Vachaspathi, S/o Sivaraman R/o Rosenda Court, Sandiago 265,
U.S.A.
4. Central Chinmaya Mission Trust, rep. by Chief Executive Sandipani
Sadhanalaya, Powaipark Drive, Mumbai-72
5. P L Mittal President, Chinmaya Mission R/o Near Governor's Bungalow,
Visakhapatnam
...RESPONDENTS
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2001(CMP. NO: 3749 OF 2001)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
grant temporary injunction restraining the respondents 3 and 5 herein from
altering the nature of the suit property in O.S.No.375 of 1986 on the file of the
Court of the Ist Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam or making any
constructions thereon pending disposal of the above appeal
I.A. NO: 1 OF 1997(CMP. NO: 5889 OF 1997)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
condone the delay of 429 days in presenting the above appeal
Counsel for the Appellant(s): SRI..
Counsel for the Respondents: T BHEEMSEN & T V PRANAI KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondents: 6839/S DWARAKANATH
Counsel for the Respondents: 859/PASAM SRINIVASA REDDY
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
1. Today, when the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal', there is no
representation on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not inclined
to prosecute the appeal.
2. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Dt.12.02.2024 CVD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!