Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

New India Assurance Company Ltd vs Panithi Jhansi
2024 Latest Caselaw 7911 AP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7911 AP
Judgement Date : 30 August, 2024

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

New India Assurance Company Ltd vs Panithi Jhansi on 30 August, 2024

APHC010106202024

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                   AT AMARAVATI                [3311]
                            (Special Original Jurisdiction)

                   FRIDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST
                     TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
                                PRESENT
            THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI
   MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 439/2024
Between:
New India Assurance Company Ltd                          ...APPELLANT
                                   AND
Panithi Jhansi and Others                          ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Appellant:

1. NARESH BYRAPANENI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. SIVA PRASAD KATAKAMSETTY

The Court made the following:

MACMA.No.439 of 2024

MAIN CASE NO: MACMA No.439 of 2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE No. NOTE

30.08.2024 BSB, J

This petition is filed to condone the delay of 110 days in re-presentation of M.A.C.M.A.439 /2024 filed against the Judgment and award in M.V.O.P.No. 471 of 2018 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -Cum- II Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Guntur, dated 8 September, 2023.

The learned counsel for the respondents no.1 to 3 reported no counter.

For the reasons stated in the affidavit, the petition is allowed.

_________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI,J

This petition is filed under Section 151 CPC to grant stay of operation of the decree and Judgment in M.V.O.P.No. 471 of 2018 on the file of the court of Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -Cum- II Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Guntur, dated 8.09.2024, pending disposal of the main C.M.A.

The learned counsel for the respondents no.1 to 3 reported no counter, however he requested to direct the

petitioner/appellant to make deposit of the amount of compensation, if the court is inclined to grant stay and further to permit the respondents no.1 to 3/claimants to withdraw the amount deposited as per the entitlement directed in the award.

In the light of the above statements, for the reasons stated in the affidavit and the grounds raised in the appeal, a conditional order of stay is granted, subject to condition of deposit of 50% of the decretal amount before the Tribunal within eight (8) weeks from this order, failing which the stay gets vacated without any further order.

The respondent no.1 is permitted to withdraw the proportionate amount deposited by the appellant to the credit of MVOP No.471 of 2018 in accordance with the arrangement made by the Tribunal in the impugned award, without furnishing any security, subject to result of the appeal. The amount of proportionate share of the respondents no.2 and 3 shall be kept in the fixed deposit as per the direction in the award.

_________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI,J

Post after two (2) months. Call for the LCR.

_________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI,J

PNV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter