Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abdul Nazar Mohammad vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
2024 Latest Caselaw 7260 AP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7260 AP
Judgement Date : 19 August, 2024

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Abdul Nazar Mohammad vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 19 August, 2024

APHC010341382024      IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
                                  PRADESH
                               AT AMARAVATI               [3368]
                        (Special Original Jurisdiction)

        MONDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST
           TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

                   PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI

                   CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5502/2024
Between:
  1. ABDUL NAZAR MOHAMMAD, S/O ABDUL KHADAR
     SHAIK, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS,
     RESIDENT OF D.NO.2-4-8/3, MOLLA STREET, 4TH
     WARD, NEAR MARKET, PONNUR TOWN AND MANDAL,
     GUNTUR DISTRICT.
  2. SHAIK JAFFAR @ MD JAFFAR, S/O SHAIK ABDUL
     KHADER, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS,
     RESIDENT OF D.NO.2-4-8/3, MOIIA STREET,  4TH
     WARD, NEAR MARKET, PONNUR TOWN AND MANDAL,
     GUNTUR DISTRICT.
  3. SHAIK ABBAS, S/O SHAIK BAJI, AGED ABOUT 38
     YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.3-6-7,
     DUFFPET, 5TH WARD, PONNUR TOWN, GUNTUR
     DISTRICT.
  4. PATTAN SUBHANI @ SK SUBHANI, S/O PATTAN
     BASHA, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS,
     RESIDENT OF D.NO.5-25-6/1, RAILPETA, STATION
     ROAD, 9TH WARD, PONNUR TOWN AND MANDAL,
     GUNTUR DISTRICT.
  5. SHAIK GOUSE BASHA, S/O JAKIR BASHA, AGED
     ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, RESIDENT OF
     D.NO. 15-8-20/2, ISLAMPETA,      20TH WARD,
     ISLAMPETA, PONNUR TOWN AND MANDAL, GUNTUR
     DISTRICT.
  6. AZHARUDDIN SHAIK @ SK HAZOOR, S/O KHAJA
     MOHIDDEN SHAIK, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC
     BUSINESS,    RESIDENT OF D.NO.23-4-14, NEAR
                                 2
                                                                BVLNC,J
                                                   Crl.P.No.5502 of 2024


     TUKARAM RICE MILL, 29TH WARD, PONNUR MANDAL,
     GUNTUR DISTRICT.
  7. SALMANI SHAIK, S/O MAHABOOB SUBHANI, AGED
     ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, RESIDENT OF
     D.NO.24-5-22, SHAROOF BAZAAR,        DABA BADI
     STREET, PONNUR TOWN AND MANDAL, GUNTUR
     DISTRICT.
                            ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
                         AND
  1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS
     PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P AT
     AMARAVATHI.
  2. SHAIK MAHAMMAD MAMU, S/O KHAZAVALI, AGED
     ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, RESIDENT OF
     D.NO.SALEHA APARTMENT, OPP TO TUKARAM RICE
     MILL, SHARAFF BAZAR,        PONNUR TOWN AND
     MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT
                     ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
  1. VUTUPALLI RAJANNA
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
  1. KUMARA RATNAM TENNETI
  2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Court made the following:

                  IA Nos.2 and 3 of 2024
                           in/and
             Criminal Petition No.5502 of 2024


COMMON ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/A.1 to A.7,

under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking

BVLNC,J

to quash the proceedings in Crime No.55 of 2024 on the file of

Ponnuur Town Police Station.

2. Sri Vutupalli Rajanna, learned counsel for the petitioners

and Sri Kummara Ratnam Tenneti, learned counsel representing

for the unofficial respondent No.2 (defacto-complainant) and

Sri.A.Rohit, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the

State are present.

3. Today, when the matter is taken up, petitioners

herein/Accused Nos.1 to 7 and 2nd respondent herein are

present before this Court. They produced their respective aadhar

cards in proof of their identity. Learned counsel for the

petitioners and the learned counsel for 2nd respondent have

identified both the parties in the open Court.

4. This Court has questioned 2nd respondent herein/de facto

complainant with regard to compromise, and he categorically

stated to that extent that he has voluntarily entered into

compromise with the petitioners herein/Accused Nos.1 to 7.

This Court is satisfied with the identification of the parties and

voluntariness in arriving at the compromise. In view of the

BVLNC,J

compromise between the parties, the chances of conviction are

remote and bleak.

5. In the light of judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the

case of Gian Singh v. State of Punjab & another1, on quashing

of criminal case, when the parties entered into settlement and

compromise, the Criminal Petition is allowed and therefore, the

case proceedings in Crime No.55 of 2024 on the file of Ponnuru

Town Police Station, against the petitioners herein/ Accused

Nos.1 to 7 are hereby quashed.

6. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 and Criminal Petition

No.5502 of 2024 are allowed.

As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any,

pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.

                                  ____________________     _
                                   B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI, J


Dt. 19.08.2024
SAB





    2012 (9) Scale 257

                                                         BVLNC,J






HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI

I.A Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 in/and Criminal Petition No.5502 of 2024

Dt.19-08-2024

SAB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter