Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6665 AP
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2024
APHC010333262024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3330]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF AUGUST
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 16782/2024
Between:
Adithe Satyanarayana PG College ...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
The Court made the following order:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India seeking the following relief:
"...to pass an order or orders or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring that the inaction of Respondent No.2 in considering my representation dated 26.07.2024 to enable the petitioner college to submit the EOA Application for the year 2024-2025 in AlCTE web portal as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional besides being violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 26.07.2024 to enable the petitioner college to submit the EOA Application for the year 2024-2025 in AlCTE web portal and pass such other order or orders..."
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for
the respondents.
3. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that
the petitioner-college made a representation to the 2nd respondent on
26.07.2024 and the 2nd respondent has not passed any orders.
Therefore, he filed the present writ petition seeking a direction to the
respondents for disposal of the representation.
4 Though petition is not maintainable in view of the judgment of the
Hon'ble Apex Court in Union of India v. P.Venkatesh1. Still, this Court
has agreed for disposal of the writ petition directing the respondents to
2019 (15) SCC 613
consider the representation dated 26.07.2024 made by the petitioner
and examine the same and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with
law, and communicate the said decision to the petitioner, within a
period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There
shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall
also stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO Date: 02.08.2024 KBN
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.16782 of 2024
Date: 02.08.2024
KBN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!