Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The District Collector vs K Allemma
2024 Latest Caselaw 3047 AP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3047 AP
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2024

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

The District Collector vs K Allemma on 1 April, 2024

Author: R Raghunandan Rao

Bench: R Raghunandan Rao

APHC010                                                              Bench Sr.No:-91
377172023        IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH                     [3446]
                             AT AMARAVATI

                               I.A.No.1 of 2024
                                    in/and
                         WRIT APPEAL NO: 784 of 2023


The District Collector and Others                              ...APPELLANT(S)

      Vs.

K Allemma and Others                                         ...RESPONDENT(S)

                                   **********

GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP), Advocate(s) for Petitioner(s)

CH SIDDHARTHA SARMA, Advocate(s) for Respondent(s)

CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

DATE : 1st April 2024

PC:

The present application is filed seeking condonation of 572 days

delay in preferring the present appeal against the judgment and order

dated 05.01.2022. The Appeal was preferred on 31.07.2023.

2. It is pertinent to mention that the presence of the learned

Government Pleader for Land Acquisition was specifically recorded in

the judgment and order impugned. However, with a view to explain the

delay, the only explanation which has been rendered in the application

is as under:

"4. I humbly submit that the date of order was passed on 05.01.2022 and order copy applied 21.06.2023 which was received on 14.07.2023, thereafter appeal has been filed on 31.07.2023.

5. I further humbly submit that, at the time of passing of the order by the Hon'ble learned Single Judge the districts were not bifurcated. But subsequently on 03.04.2022 the Chittoor District has been bifurcated and a new district has been formed as Tirupati District. Hence, the appellant 1 & 2 being 3rd parties to the writ petition has filed an application for leave, as the property situated within the jurisdiction of Tirupati and also the petitioners did not amend the cause title by changing the full cause title of the Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue (Land Acquisition) Department, A.P.Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District."

3. Learned counsel for the non-applicant however has drawn our

attention to a similar ground having urged in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in

W.A.No.784 of 2023, wherein this Court had rejected a similar

explanation and dismissed the application filed by the Government.

4. In our opinion the explanation rendered in the application seeking

condonation of delay is neither convincing nor can persuade us to

condone the gross delay of as many as 572 days.

5. For the reasons mentioned above, we find no merit in the present

application and is accordingly dismissed. Consequently, the Letters

Patent Appeal shall stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to

costs.

Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall stand closed.

DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ

R RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J SRT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter