Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kothapalli Prasad vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
2023 Latest Caselaw 2727 AP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2727 AP
Judgement Date : 2 May, 2023

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Kothapalli Prasad vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 2 May, 2023
Bench: A V Sai, Duppala Venkata Ramana
                                                                                                             _I
                                                                                    .I-.t~             -'|        I



     . //.



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl r[ 3381
                                  TUESDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF MAY
                                 ll^/O THOUSAND AND ll^/ENTY THREE ~
                                             :PRESENT:
                            THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A V SESHA SAI
                                                AND
                      THE HONOURABLE S'RI JUSTICE DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA ,

                                                                        !ANo.1 OF2023                                                      _
                                                                                                                       IN
                                               CRLA NO: 2403 OF 2O18 J
             Between :                                                              ®~




             / Kothapalli Prasad, S/o. KothapalliNagarathnam @ Karunakaran,Aged about 33
                years, R/o. Bommaiahpalli (V) SC Colony, vedurukupaam Mandal, Chittoor,
                District, Andhra Pradesh
                                                                                                                                                   .. , Pet]'tioner/Appellant
                                                                              I-`
                                                                    +     I
                                                                                                                                     (petitioner in CRLA 2403 OF 2018
                                                                                                                                                 on the file of High Court)
             AND
                                                                                          >   {


                                            :;:_. = ±`\>.


               The State of Andhra Pradesh, Re+:;'by its Public Prosecutor, (AP) High Court of
                Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathii;..+,I: ;-`',:.T`
                                                                                                                                                           ...Respondent
                                                    \    _\`,                ..\\
                                                I       Tr.la             ..€;^;_.r'              {    .     ch'            >

                                                                                                                                                   (Respondents in-dO-)

                                                                        I,1.,
                                                                              /           :,,..,|~.,.:.,                        /;


                     petition under section 389(1) of 6-r.p.c.,                                                                      praying that in the circumstances

stated in the memorandum of.:girQti:n_dS,fil6dL in Support.Of the Petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the:`exe6utidn-1+c,f sentence of petitioners in sc No.166 of 2017 dt. 24-ll-20f7 on the file ofi!tth6|lll',tAddl. District and Sessions Judge, Tirupathi and release the Petitioner on bailt'^~on:|a'hyrJ6onditions, Pending disposal of CRLA No. 2403 of 2018, on the file of the High Court.

/ The petition coming on for,hearing, upon perusing the petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in ,support thereof and the order of the High Court dated 08.07.2021 Jmade in I.A.N6'.1`{of 2021 of C,RLA.No.2403 of 2018 and upon hearing the arguments of S.Madhava3-.JRa~o for the AppeIIant and of Publl'c Prosecutor for the Respondent, the court made the following

ORDER I llThis is an application, filed under Section 389(1) of the Code o\f I

• '\J I.

Main Criminal Appeal-;`,¢arTie..*O:`b\e Preferred by the Petitioner-accused against,,`.the judgment dated 24!.:`i`'1:2d1'?t, `passed by the court of the learned Ill ( i/I:.1;`.I

Additional District and Sessiohs,'-Judge; Tirupati, in Sessions Case No.166 of 4r. i

2017. By way of the said judgrfe'nt;~a`the leamed sessions Judge convicted the accused-petitioner herein for the'-offence punishable under Section 302 I.P.C., •la.I;!i.i,I,;';

                                                               i,r:i,                     i           lf,,if


                                                        ... I,#{t..,|'.t`..I(I,i:l`>

                                                             I:;-;_Ll.;:;             ,)/,                            ...
                                                                                          .,ir,._..`I^'




I-
                                                 ''i.,£\\-.l,.




                                                          ll.i.i=,.        ,..i I:.+




and sentenced him to undergo .,`.imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-, in default, to suffer Sifa\P[e imprisonment for three mOnthSl ln this application, the petitioner is seeking bail by placing reliance on the judgment of the compd§ite Hi~g-h Court of Andhra Pradesh in the case of Batchu Rangarao and brg.I;`;A V£'gS_`;` state.`of Andhra Pradesh reported 'ln T2016(3, ALT (Criminal) 505 (AP)I lh*Jtth6 -i-aid judgment, the Court laid down the ('

following guidelines, while cbri§i`d|6Fing`'the bail applications of the present I_I- )/

nature:

"(1) A person who is conV-lcted for life and whose appeal is_pending before this court -ls entitled to,apply for bail after he has undergone a minimum of five years imprisonment following h-IS conviction;,

(2) Grant of bail in favour of*persons failing in (1) supra shall Pe subject to his good condyeSIj,n,:Ill,e jail, as reported by the respective Jail-Superinterfdents; , bl .I -` ,* I.+.::.:T_,i.,i./.:`J.I.I i ..*| ._:

(e3: ti',ffe#eo :oel lroe%:IansgedC g#gBO=[li }£esP: i tCeatSheeSi'r :hatei sffi nnVg-I 3htse c#± r#ao:n?1e) and (2) supra.' , `: +`¢€,}`:5:: ` :-`-. :

The offences relating ;i ;#* jSjSPIed_with murder _pf minpr_childrep dacoity, murder for gain`;I;REdriaPSi:bg for ransom, killing of the public servants, the offences faIIihg',`urlder+the National Security Act and the offences pertaining to narqotic`, drugs., f| i . _~` -I.

                                                            ~S`«       I..`
                                                                   --.-`




(4) While granting bail, thir`;two-following conditions apart from usual conditions have to be imposed;t`viz., (1) the appeIIants on bail must be present I]efore the Court atr`the time of hearing of the Criminal Appeals; and (2) they must :deport in the respective Police Stations once in a month during the`,`haiI:period.",

I i )

Instructions furnishe:q,tot?`¥Jty'.;t*,e`.`ijalil Superintendent are placed on record t'¢

by the learned public ProS6®`ut6+i,,ji'A'¢cording to the said instructions, the A,I

conduct of the petitioner is satis`fac~tory and he has completed more than five ... lJ _l{,f...:.,

years of actual sentence. lt isJ'jrf6toLth-e-i_,;dJase of the prosecution that the instant case falls under the exceptions,tf`iiStf-rib'Sf#ritii'`6ned in the aforesaid decision. `~,\

For the aforesaid reasonsf+1thiSJ'`petition is allowed, directing enlargement of the{petitioner on bail subject t?*.,t`be petitioner furnishing a personal bond of Rs.20,OOO/- (Rupees Twenty Th;visand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of I :t#r€`-;;,g+i96,u rt of the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First class, PLjttu;#:I,I-,-I,;3+`'[t,i`iS.made Clear that the Petitioner Shall

l l} tr, s*

`S;A-`-I:i:`.I;..-`.-I.I-

I. i.+. i ,_-:i.-ut . _ ~+----

attend before the said colj'rt':6hJ``'`+'o-n€-jday in the first week of every month,

pending appeal and if the s'ain'6fi'S~`n'dt\l'adhered to, the same be brought to the notice of this court for passiJ'hg,neCte:tSary order for cancellation Of bail. [t iS further made clear that at the-ti ft66a`ring the appeal, the petitioner shall be 't I,)

present before this Court."

sd/-s. sR'N!VASA PRASAE} ASSISTANT REG!ST I: i.'1A/ a`

ul(q/.FIR,[J. I CO PY// SECTION OFF-lCER To,

1. The Ill Additional District and ,Sees_~ions Judge, Tirupati ;`.

2. The Additional Judicial Ma`gistrat:+6f First Class, Puttur, Chittoor.

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Kadapa.

£ I Tohnee l3scpteocto;rrioS uproel;Oaf,il.I` Kivflaa%ehglpaagdaaroamAdCv:r::et,e?3igtoJocr] D istrict|

6. Two cos to Public.Prose-cut6r,I Hi6h court ofAP [OUT]

7,. Twospare copies, ``!,ty2,.¥r., tu_.,I;:...,,I RVK

I.I HIGH COURT

AVSSJ & DVRJ

DATED:02/O5/2023

ORDER

lANo.1 OF2023 IN CRLA NO: 2403 OF 2018

/`

ti_o

«\\. \

DIRECTION `S`d `,

RS (5\

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter