Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

T.Seshagiri vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh
2023 Latest Caselaw 154 AP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 154 AP
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2023

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
T.Seshagiri vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh on 6 January, 2023
                                       1




         THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO

              WRIT PETITION (A.T) No.474 of 2021

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed, seeking the following relief: ".....to issue a Writ, Order or direction to call for the records connected to order in proceedings R.C.No.H4/6557/2011, dated 14.10.2015 passed by the 3rd respondent therein, examine the same and set it aside after declaring the same as illegal, irregular, irrational and violative of principles of service jurisprudence and consequently the 3rd respondent herein to fix the notional seniority in the cadre of typist i.e from 30.11.1987 and give him all consequential benefits such as revision of seniority and promotion as Senior Assistant and further promotion as Office Superintendent (Extension Officer (PR and RD)) and other benefits as per Government memo dated 11139/E-VA/2011, dated 09.06.2011 passed by the 1st respondent herein and order in R.C.No.H6/3277/2008, dated 15.10.2009 passed by the Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Eluru and pass such other orders."

2. Heard Mr. I. Munni Raja, learned counsel for the

petitioner and learned Government Pleader, Services-IV and Mr. G.

Srinivasulu Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was

appointed as Typist on daily wage basis from 30.11.1987. The

Government also issued G.O.Ms.No.618, dated 23.09.1994

regularizing the services of the petitioner from the date of his

initial appointment i.e from 30.11.1987 along with other persons.

While the matter stood thus, the petitioner was kept under

suspension from 04.09.1995 to 14.07.1999 on the ground that

there was a private criminal case pending against him. Therefore

the respondents did not revise the pay scales as per the

regularization order passed by the Government dated 23.09.1994.

Inspite of the orders passed by the learned Tribunal and also this

Court the Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Nallajerla paid

the arrears of salary and allowances in the year 2007 as per orders

of the learned Tribunal in O.A.No.377 of 1996, dated 17.09.1997.

But the respondents did not fix correct pay for grant of automatic

advancement scheme increments for 8 and 16 years from the date

of his initial regularization i.e 03.11.1987 as Typist. Therefore the

petitioner made representations to the respondents, but in vain.

Hence the petitioner filed O.A.No. 3368 of 2008 before the learned

Tribunal. Pursuant to the order of the learned Tribunal dated

14.07.2009, the Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Praja

Parishad, Eluru granted Automatic Advancement Scheme of 8/16

years scale and pay to the petitioner taking into consideration of

the date of initial appointment and regularization i.e 30.11.1987

vide proceedings dated 20.11.2009 and declared probation and the

same was entered into service book also. It is further contended

that some of the juniors of the petitioner were promoted as Senior

Assistant in the year 2003 and also promoted as Office

Superintendent in the year 2010. Inspite of several

representations, the respondents failed to fix the notional

seniority, though the petitioner's services were regularized with

effect from 30.11.1987. Therefore inaction of the respondents is

questioned in this Writ Petition.

4. No counter-affidavit is filed.

5. During hearing learned counsel for the petitioner would

contend that inspite of several orders of this Court and also

learned Tribunal the respondents deliberately not implementing

the same and failed to fix the notional seniority of the petitioner.

Consequently the respondents effected promotions to the juniors

of the petitioner, without considering his case, which is highly

illegal and arbitrary.

6. It is apparent on the face of the record that the petitioner

has moved several cases before the learned Tribunal as well as this

Court. Learned Tribunal passed an order in O.A.No.9217 of 2011

directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for

notional seniority in the cadre of Typist, Senior Assistant and

Officer Superintendent/ Extension Officer in the department by

taking into consideration the date of regularization i.e from the

date of appointment as 30.11.1987 as per G.O.Ms.No.618, dated

23.09.1994. Subsequently the respondents failed to do so. In view

of gross negligence on the part of the respondents, the juniors of

the petitioners were promoted to the next higher cadre. Further

the petitioner fought against the respondents by filing series of

cases for respective reliefs since several decades. Therefore in view

of the catena of judgments passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court and

also this Court in similar set of facts, this Court felt it appropriate

to allow the writ petition in to to as it is made clear that the as per

directions of the learned Tribunal directed the respondents to fix

the notional seniority in the cadre of Typist, Senior Assistant and

Officer Superintendent/ Extension Officer in the department by

taking into consideration the date of regularization i.e from the

date of appointment as 30.11.1987 as per G.O.Ms.No.618, dated

23.09.1994.

7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed, while declaring

the impugned proceedings dated 14.10.2015 issued by the 3rd

respondent as illegal and arbitrary and same is hereby set aside.

The respondents are directed to fix the notional seniority in the

cadre of Typist with effect from 30.11.1987 and release all

increments and consequential benefits to the petitioner, such as

revision of seniority and further respective promotions to the next

higher level along with consequential benefits as per Government

memo dated 09.06.2011 issued by the 1st respondent and order in

R.C.No.H6/3277/2008, dated 15.10.2009 passed by the Deputy

Chief Executive Officer, Eluru, within a period of eight (08) weeks

from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no

order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall

also stand closed.

___________________________________ DR.JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO Date: 05.01.2023.

KK

THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO

WRIT PETITION (AT) No.474 of 2021

Date:05.01.2023.

KK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter