Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Yarajarla Venkata Siva Babu vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
2023 Latest Caselaw 808 AP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 808 AP
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2023

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Yarajarla Venkata Siva Babu vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 10 February, 2023
     THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.9914 & 9921 of 2022

COMMON ORDER:

As these two Criminal Petitions have been filed for

quashing interconnected complaints, it would be appropriate to

dispose of both these petitions together.

2. The background in which these petitions have been

filed is as follows:

A complaint was filed against the petitioners in

Crl.P.No.9921 of 2022 for offences under Sections 341, 384, 307

r/w 34 of I.P.C and Section 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(v) of SC ST (Prevention

of Atrocities) Act. This complaint was registered as Crime No.416

of 2022, on the file of Pedavegi Police Station, East Godavari

District on 05.12.2022.

3. The complaint in this case was that the petitioners

in Crl.P.No.9921 of 2022 had assaulted the de facto

complainant and others with an intention to kill the de facto

complainant on 04.12.2022. The petitioners are also said to

have abused the de facto complainant in the name of his

community.

4. Another complaint was given against the petitioners

in Crl.P.No.9914 of 2022, for offences under Sections 143, 448,

307, 324, 323, 506 (2) r/w 149 of I.P.C., on 05.12.2022 which

was registered as Crime No.638 of 2022 in Eluru II Town Police

Station, Eluru District. The allegation in this complaint was that

the persons who had been injured in the earlier incident were

being treated in a hospital when the petitioners in Crl.P.No.9914

of 2022 had come to the hospital and attacked the injured

persons with a view to kill them.

5. The petitioners have approached this Court for

quashing both the complaints on the ground that the said

complaints are false. Sri Posani Venkateswarlu, the learned

Senior Counsel appearing for Sri Sai Surya Teja in both the

petitions, would submit that it was the petitioners who had been

attacked by the de facto complainant and others in both the

cases and in fact one of the petitioners in the case had received

grievous injuries requiring stitches on the scalp of the said

person. Sri Posani Venkateswarlu would submit that a person

who required stitches on his scalp was clearly in no position to

have attacked anybody on that day and this solitary fact is

sufficient to show that both the complaints are false complaints

made against the petitioners on account of political differences

between the group of the de facto complainant and the

petitioners herein. Sri Posani Venkateswarlu would rely upon

the Judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of

Andhra Pradesh vs. Rayavarapu Punnayya and Another 1,

Hari Singh vs. Sukhbir Singh and Others2 and Hema Mishra

vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors3. The learned Senior

Counsel has also relied upon a Judgment of the erstwhile High

Court of Andhra Pradesh in K.Mallesham vs. State of Andhra

Pradesh4.

6. In the present case, the matter is still at the stage of

investigation and a question of whether the offences alleged in

the First Information Reports had been made out or not can only

be determined upon a proper investigation in the matter.

However, the fact that one of the petitioners himself had

suffered an injury on the scalp on account of being beaten on

the head, cannot be put aside.

7. The provisions of Section 41A of Cr.P.C are not

available in the present case on account of the provisions of

Section 307 of I.P.C being included in the First Information

Report. However, this Court would caution the investigating

officer to proceed with due care while contemplating any arrest

of the petitioners herein, in the course of investigation. Reasons

(1976) 4 SCC 382

(1988) 4 SCC 551

(2014) 4 SCC 453

(1998) 5 ALD 120.

are to be recorded before any arrests are undertaken in the

matter.

8. Subject to the aforesaid observations, investigation

in the case may go on.

9. Accordingly, these Criminal Petitions are disposed

of.

Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________________ JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO Date : 10.02.2023 RJS

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.9914 & 9921 of 2022

Date : 10.02.2023

RJS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter