Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5897 AP
Judgement Date : 7 December, 2023
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AMARAVATHI
MAIN CASE No: A.S.No. 214 of 2009
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. DATE OFFICE
No ORDER NOTE
07 07.12.2023 Dr.VRKS,J
O.S.No.95 of 2006 is a suit for recovery of
money filed by one plaintiff as against two
defendants.
After due contest, by judgment dated
22.10.2008 learned Senior Civil Judge,
Madanapalle decreed the suit in part in favour
of the plaintiff. Since it was a suit on mortgage,
the preliminary decree was ordered to be drawn
up. Aggrieved by the same, the plaintiff
preferred the present first appeal.
The name of the 2nd defendant in the
original suit is Sri C. Janakirama Naidu.
However, in the first appeal papers, the said
name is shown as respondent No.2 as Smt.
M.R.Sakunthala.
It is in this contest, appellant filed I.A.No.1 of 2022 stating that the incorrect name was printed out of over cite and seeks its rectification.
Today learned counsel on both sides are present.
Heard both sides.
Perused the record. P.T.O From the cause title in the record, it is at once heard that was a typographical error that crept in describing the name of the 2nd respondent.
In these circumstances, I.A.No.1 of 2023 is "allowed".
Registry is directed to delete the name of Smt. M.R.Sakunthala and substitute the same in the name Sri C. Janakirama Naidu.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that there is connected matter in A.S.No.419 of 2009.
Registry is directed to list both the matters together.
List these two matters after six (06) weeks.
___________ Dr.VRKS,J
SR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!