Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Theegala Suresh vs The State Of Ap., Another
2023 Latest Caselaw 5833 AP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5833 AP
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2023

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Theegala Suresh vs The State Of Ap., Another on 6 December, 2023

Author: K.Suresh Reddy

Bench: K.Suresh Reddy

          HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY

          CRIMINAL PETITION. NO. 3164 OF 2014

ORDER:

-

The petitioner/Accused in Crime No.18 of 2014 of

Vakadu Police Station, Nellore District, filed the present

application, under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking to quash

the proceedings.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well

as the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the de-facto

complainant is a resident of Dugarajapatnam Village,

Vakadu Mandal and he belongs to 'SC' Community. It is

alleged by the 2nd respondent in his complaint that the

petitioner purchased certain extent of land in the Village

and he also encroached the Government land and doing

Aquaculture Business. Thereafter, he lodged a complaint

to the Revenue Authorities by bringing to their notice about

the encroachment of the Government land by the

petitioner. While so, on 06.03.2014 at about 10.30 p.m.,

the petitioner along with others went to the house of the

de-facto complainant, armed with deadly weapons and

abused him in filthy language in the name of Caste, as the

2nd respondent gave a report to Revenue Officials against

the petitioner. At the intervention of neighbors, petitioner

and others left the place.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that

the report given by the 2nd respondent is a false report and

he gave this report to the Police with a mala fide intention

to settle the score in a civil dispute pending between the

petitioner and the 2nd respondent. It is further contended

that as the 2nd respondent and another are interfering with

the peaceful possession and enjoyment of his land, he filed

a Civil Suit, vide Receive and Transmit Petition No.57 of

2013 before the erstwhile High Court along with Receive

and Transmit Miscellaneous Petition No.59 of 2013 seeking

an ex parte interim injunction. The erstwhile High Court

granted an ex parte temporary injunction, by order, dated

17.08.2013. It is only thereafter, i.e., on 11.03.2014, the

2nd respondent gave the present report to the Police. On

the basis of which, the present crime has been registered.

The learned counsel for the petitioner further contends

that the 2nd respondent gave the present report with a

mala fide intention to settle a score in civil dispute pending

between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent. He further

contends that the present case is squarely covered by the

Guideline No. 7 of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court

in State of Haryana and others Vs Ch. Bhajan Lal and

others1.

5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the 2nd

respondent opposed the Criminal Petition contending that

there are specific allegations made against the petitioner.

He further contended that the petitioner abused him in the

name of Caste and as such, the ingredients of the offence

under Section 3 (1) (10) of the Scheduled Castes and the

Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 have

been made out.

6. This Court perused the entire material on record.

7. As seen from the material, the petitioner has already

obtained an interim injunction against the 2nd respondent

as early as on 17.08.2023. As such, there is no necessity

for the petitioner to go to the house of the 2nd respondent

and to abuse him in the name of Caste. On the other

1992 AIR 604

hand, it seems, it is only with a mala fide intention to settle

a score against the petitioner, the de-facto complainant

seems to have given the present report against the

petitioner. In the considered opinion of this Court, the said

proceedings are nothing but abuse of process of law.

Hence, they are liable to be quashed.

8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the

proceedings initiated against the petitioner in Crime No.18

of 2014 of Vakadu Police Station, Nellore District, are

hereby quashed.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed in consequence.

_____________________ K.SURESH REDDY,J Date: 06.12.2023 RSI/TSNR

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SURESH REDDY

CRIMINAL PETITION No. 3164 of 2014

Date: 06.12.2023.

RSI/TSNR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter