Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8889 AP
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2022
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
WRIT PETITION No.21007 OF 2022
JUDGMENT:-
1. Heard Smt Kavitha Gottipati, learned counsel for the
petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Municipal
Administration, representing respondent Nos.1 & 3, Smt V.
Padmaja, learned Government Pleader for Finance, representing
respondent Nos.2, 6 and 7 and Sri N. Ranga Reddy, learned
standing counsel for respondents 4 and 5.
2. With the consent of the parties counsels, the writ petition
is being disposed of finally at this stage.
3. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India has been filed for the following relief:-
"It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to an appropriate Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the 4th and Final Bill net amount of Rs.80,61,371/- even after finalizing the bill payable to the petitioner in relation to the execution of work i.e Construction of CC Roads and CC Drains in Various wards 6, 16, 36, 39 and 40 of Kavali Municipality under TSP Grant 2016-17 Single Package vide agreement No.105/2018-19/TSP Grant dated 27-07-2018 and Supplemental Agreement No. 184/2019-20/TSP dated 10-07-2019 as the same is illegal arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents to
release an amount of Rs.80,61,371/- with interest 12 percent per annum to the petitioner in respect of execution of afore mentioned work forthwith and to pass necessary orders."
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner completed the works to the satisfaction of the
respondents within the stipulated time under the agreement by
engaging the men and machinery. The respondents are not
justified in withholding the amount payable to the petitioner.
Such action on their part is illegal and arbitrary.
5. Smt V. Padmaja, learned AGP for Finance on the basis of
instructions submits that the Finance Department has released
the required amount vide G.O.Rt.No.3265 dated 10.06.2022 and
G.O.Rt.No.3408 dated 08.07.2022 to clear the pending bill in as
per the proposal of the MA & UD Department and the Municipal
Authority has to resubmit the admitted bills to the financial
department for clearance and after receiving the bills the same
will be cleared on priority basis.
6. Sri N. Ranga Reddy, learned standing counsel for the
respondents 4 and 5 submits that the respondent No.4 shall
resubmit/upload the bills again in CFMS website within a
period of two (02) weeks from today.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner has also claimed interest on delayed payment but
with respect to that prayer, liberty may be granted to the
petitioner to approach in appropriate proceedings.
8. The bills for payment of the petitioner are pending since
long and such nonpayment is not justified if the petitioner has
discharged the work under the agreement, in terms of the
agreement.
9. However, considering the submissions advanced by the
learned counsels for the parties/and after recording the stand of
the respondents as submitted, the writ petition is being
disposed of finally with the following directions:-
a) The 4th respondent shall resubmit/upload the bills of the
petitioner for the work in question, in CFMS portal within
two (02) weeks from today;
b) The 2nd respondent - Principal Secretary, Finance
Department, shall within a further period of eight (8)
weeks shall release the amount payable, to the petitioner,
on due verification and scrutiny as per the procedure, if
there is no other legal impediments in making payment.
c) The entire exercise shall be completed positively in ten
(10) weeks from today.
10. So far as the petitioner's prayer for interest is concerned,
it would involve determination of various factors including
questions of fact. Consequently, at this stage in the exercise of
writ jurisdiction, the Court is not entering into that aspect, and
as requested by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the
petitioner is granted liberty to approach the appropriate forum,
if so advised, clarifying that the grant of time to the respondents
as aforesaid, would not adversely affect the petitioner's claim for
interest for the period of entitlement, if any, under law.
11. The writ petition is disposed of finally with the aforesaid
directions and observations. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any
pending, shall also stand closed.
__________________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J Date:21.11.2022 Gk
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
WRIT PETITION No.21007 OF 2022
Date:21.11.2022 Gk.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!