Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8860 AP
Judgement Date : 18 November, 2022
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
MAIN CASE : S.A.No.384 of 2022
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
12. 18.11.2022
SRS,J
S.A.No.384 of 2022
Plaintiff in the suit filed the present second
appeal against the judgment and decree, dated
22.11.2021 passed in A.S.No.7 of 2019 on the file of
learned Senior Civil Judge, Tekkali, Srikakulam
District reversing the judgment and decree, dated
12.06.2019 passed in O.S.No.54 of 2013 on the file of
learned Junior Civil Judge, Tekkali.
Plaintiff filed O.S.No.54 of 2013 for injunction
restraining the defendants, their agents, associates,
servants and workmen from ever interfering with the
peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff, over
the plaint schedule property.
The trial Court decreed the suit with costs
restraining the defendants, their agents, associates,
servants and workmen, from ever interfering with
peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff, over
the plaint schedule property. Aggrieved by the same,
defendants filed A.S.No.7 of 2019 and the same was
allowed, against which the present second appeal is
filed by the plaintiff.
Heard.
Admit.
The following substantial questions of law arise
for consideration.
1.
Whether the finding of the appellate Court that suit is filed for injunction against coparcener/co-sharer is based on the evidence on record? If not the judgment under appeal is liable to be set aside?
2. Whether the findings given by the appellate Court regarding possession of the plaintiff, is contrary to the evidence on record?
______ SRS,J
I.A.No.1 of 2022
For filing counter, post on 16.12.2022.
______ SRS,J ikn
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!